Return-path: <jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org>
X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on
	chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.2.5
Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:24:08 -0700
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1MQivE-0005Ha-Ho; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:23:59 -0700
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1MQiut-0005HO-RX	for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:23:36 -0700
Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.121])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)	(envelope-from <phma@phma.optus.nu>)	id 1MQiuq-0005H4-Bx	for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:23:35 -0700
Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com          with ESMTP          id <20090714142325620.TLIF28563@cdptpa-omta02.mail.rr.com>          for <jbovlaste@lojban.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:23:25 +0000
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])	by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A58247AF	for <jbovlaste@lojban.org>; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:23:25 -0400 (EDT)
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: jbovlaste new entries
Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:23:22 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
References: <12d58c160907020926q110af50ct2305b84a6266d886@mail.gmail.com> <834309.95244.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <4de8c3930907140645k58af0dc8id0cc979d1142a278@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930907140645k58af0dc8id0cc979d1142a278@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200907141023.23288.phma@phma.optus.nu>
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
X-list: jbovlaste
Content-Length: 718
Lines: 24

On Tuesday 14 July 2009 09:45:03 tijlan wrote:
> What would be the gloss for "selgu'e"? "people"
> (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/people) or "native"
> (http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/native)?

I think "people" is better, but both English words are polysemous.

Then there's "natmi". Is there any difference between gugde and natmi, besides 
that a gugde has a land?

Would one say "la jugygug. gugde loi .uigru" or "la jugygug. gugde <some 
individual Uighur>"?

> As for "citizen", how about:
> flaselgu'e (citizen; member of a state)
> g2 is a citizen, a legally recognized member of g1 (country/state) in
> g3 (land/territory) by law f1.

If g2 is a people, then "flaselgu'ecmi", but the "fla-" is good.

Pierre