Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:31:39 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MPPYY-0000OV-S5; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:31:22 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:30:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MPPXb-0000OO-S2 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:30:08 -0700 Received: from imo-m27.mx.aol.com ([64.12.137.8]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MPPXL-0000K1-9r for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:30:07 -0700 Received: from imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (imo-ma03.mx.aol.com [64.12.78.138]) by imo-m27.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN3-44a57ceda17b; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:29:40 -0400 Received: from MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com by imo-ma03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v40_r1.5.) id d.cda.4c197a63 (14502) for ; Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:29:28 -0400 (EDT) From: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2009 19:29:27 EDT Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: za'e mablrxasxolo (was: Re: Newbie: How does voting work... To: jbovlaste@lojban.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_cda.4c197a63.378928d7_boundary" X-Mailer: 6.0 for Windows XP sub 11501 X-AOL-IP: 64.12.78.138 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: MorphemeAddict@wmconnect.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 2142 Lines: 69 --part1_cda.4c197a63.378928d7_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 7/10/2009 18:48:54 Eastern Daylight Time, ted.reed@gmail.com writes: > > The American Heritage dictionary says it means "an irritating or > > contemptible person". I think that all of these English phrases > > describe a more general concept than "selfish" or "bad": "bad/ > > irritating/mean/malicious/selfish/contemptible" plus "person". > > > > > > That's close to what I was trying to suggest. > > xlapre? > > --bancus > "bad person"? In this context, I think that's way too broad a word. Each of the adjectives "bad", "irritating", "mean", "malicious", "selfish", "contemptible", and more should have its own word or phrase, with or without "prenu". And why a lujvo? A tanru should be fine in most, if not all, cases. stevo --part1_cda.4c197a63.378928d7_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In a messag= e dated 7/10/2009 18:48:54 Eastern Daylight Time, ted.reed@gmail.com write= s:


> The American Herit= age dictionary says it means "an irritating or
> contemptible person". I think that all of these English phrases
> describe a more general concept than "selfish" or "bad": "bad/
> irritating/mean/malicious/selfish/contemptible" plus "person".
>
>
> That's close to what I was trying to suggest.

xlapre?

--bancus


"bad person"?  In this context, I think that's way too broad a wo= rd.  Each of the adjectives "bad", "irritating", "mean", "malicious",= "selfish", "contemptible", and more should have its own word or phrase,= with or without "prenu".  

And why a lujvo?  A tanru should be fine in most, if not all, cas= es.

stevo --part1_cda.4c197a63.378928d7_boundary--