Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:24:06 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MRIVf-0006Dg-Ph; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:23:58 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:23:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MRIUw-0006Da-9O for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:23:10 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MRIUs-0006CT-Sx for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 21:23:10 -0700 Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090716042259905.QWVQ21440@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com>; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:22:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04E25891; Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:22:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: "A. PIEKARSKI" , jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: lujvo for sports Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:22:50 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <650330.13646.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <650330.13646.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200907160022.53270.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 2369 Lines: 82 Please take discussion of new words to the jbovlaste list. On Wednesday 15 July 2009 21:53:15 you wrote: > Well, I'm sure you will all sigh with relief to read > that I am coming to the end of my lujvo-defining spree. > Just sports (below) and business left. > Here are a few more of my proposed > lujvo/fu'ivla (two for each sport: playing and the > match itself). The name of a sport should be a cmene. The brivla could have place structure "x1 plays hedge-pedge with x2", and you get a selbri for a hedge-pedge match by sticking "nu" in front. > SOCCER  > jvoblaste already has boltipkei: > > x1 is a play > gloss: football [as game] >   > I propose to change it to:: > k1=t1 plays soccer with ball of material b2 >   > from: > bolci: b1 is a ball of material b2 > tikpa: t1 kicks t2 at locus t3, using foot t4 > kelci: k1 [agent] plays with k2 >   > Soccer match: boltipyjvi > > FOOTBALL(American/Canadian) > bolbeikei > bolbeiyjvi >   > BASKETBALL > bolre'okei > bolre'ojvi > > > Now hear I propose fu'ivla.  Wherever I've travelled, > the names are always the same or very similar. Not everywhere. Italian calcium players need lots of soccer for their bones. The homonyms go back to Latin. I do agree, though, that for specific sports, fu'ivla are better; "bolre'ojvi" could refer to any of various ball-throwing games. Can you express "ulama" or "innebandy" or "jai alai" as a lujvo? > I've often come unstuck with fu'ivla which inevitably > are invalid.  My question is: to check, do I just enter > them into jbofi'e, and accept them if it comes back with > the word but no comment, or "Unrecognizable word"?  Or what? Usually that works, but occasionally it makes a mistake. "damskrima" is valid, but it rejects it. I wouldn't use that as a word; I'd say "dambrskrima" or "eskrima" (it is a sport, can you recognize it?) > RUGBY > ragrbi > ragrbi terjvi "ragrbi" is a type-3 fu'ivla for some biological organ. > BASEBALL > beisbo > beisbo terjvi "sb" is a forbidden cluster. "beizbo" is a valid word, but it's a meaningless lujvo. > CRICKET > kriketi > kriketi terjvi That is a valid fu'ivla. Be sure not to confuse it with cricket (the insect, "sanjalra" is a typo for, I guess, "sagjalra", though it's not really a jalra) or hamster (which I think is kriceto, but I'm not sure of the spelling now, and it's not in jbovlaste). phma