Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:56:27 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MXJkf-0000o1-4Y; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:56:22 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:55:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MXJjv-0000nv-MH for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:55:31 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MXJjo-0000nS-Sa for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sat, 01 Aug 2009 11:55:31 -0700 Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090801185518280.JIUR18482@cdptpa-omta01.mail.rr.com> for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 18:55:18 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107D4440E for ; Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:55:16 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: UN Date: Sat, 1 Aug 2009 14:55:09 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <4de8c3930908010706g5d923746p476a13873c30cdfb@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930908010706g5d923746p476a13873c30cdfb@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200908011455.12962.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 692 Lines: 23 On Saturday 01 August 2009 10:06:44 tijlan wrote: > Which one of these is preferable? > > simgu'a (cooperate) > s1=g1 (set/mass) cooperate on/at s2=g2 with goal/objective g3 > > gunsi'u (cooperate) > s1=g1 (set/mass) cooperate on/at s2=g2 with goal/objective g3 "rodysi'u" usually means "x1 consists of members who broda each other", so I'd say "simgu'a" is preferable. You may want to consider "kangu'a" or "kansimgu'a". On Saturday 01 August 2009 12:50:57 John Cowan wrote: > (Compare English "gorse" and "furze" and even "whin", all of which are > no more and no less than the various species of the genus _Ulex_). Irrelevant, since neither "gorse" nor "furze" is a lujvo. Pierre