Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:37:55 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Md0X1-0005C8-UW; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:37:50 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:37:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Md0WM-0005Bv-2g for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:37:02 -0700 Received: from mail-gx0-f219.google.com ([209.85.217.219]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Md0WD-0005BB-6c for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:37:01 -0700 Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so2729924gxk.0 for ; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:36:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0/+Oel0TnCOPCoSkcPDl8xck2GfMcRUwx45mbv7Ea3U=; b=a1pVYOwFX3yl+kYuRBWNI/T6xzs6NDSFSYcSC3Is+7N/1+nD7FGLML2yTHKZoVrWez Yx3KRZZElXLd2j88lP6i/0aTltNWYXKvw3m5h8sZe1T+tYR48nIOKUDmrMZayU8z7oF9 EUs8inDwtBIERaJ2E4WBEMFNd36YGWiEB6VYo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=udO0Q8tDqFnZmCrse3Dpl1nls/moxkk3AfyEyJ1y6x7uLIoFLh9McRTMd+D9Dri0X3 CxusaTz/ks8pPzyySwfjXNeBG5/PJPVHuFkaamodDBfiHL8kwlUSRD6dojNuxJcfyDaH YfvfxfFcm+HVPtWmBgSJBTT0Mmqv7B9cVCwM4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.131.2 with SMTP id e2mr5393846ybd.226.1250509005991; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 04:36:45 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4de8c3930908111633t70fa8100u9c70a627b8c2e624@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a60908141050l7c255608j43024d359e92c766@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:36:45 -0400 Message-ID: <96f789a60908170436r75d52140t6ff1edb85b74c7b3@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: from core to exosphere From: Michael Turniansky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 804 Lines: 24 On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:35 AM, tijlan wrote: > 2009/8/14 Michael Turniansky >> >> On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 7:33 PM, tijlan wrote: >> >>  Huh?  Why moi in all the following? > > > Because they are consecutive parts of a unity, the planet's atmosphere. > "glavacri" instead of "glamomvacri" would be more like the air in a hot air > balloon. > But moii aren't parts of a whole (even if I was inclined to used mo'i with non-numbers, which I'm personally not), si'e would be. I'd also disgaree that glavacri would only imply, e.g. air in a balloon, since it does have a "planet" piece. But even besides all that, why not use glavarsenta, etc. since are specifically describing layers of the atmosphere? --gejyspa