Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 06:19:22 -0700
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;        b=czfKWBV9n9abPCIROVmApJD9kjmAC81OIQd3KxPzzKAQH+Ff9UwAn9VW9SnhtIGH/4         Tt2o8xdkjQKTML6VuQtcaijHI+vj6SA5H1gs1QkIKzbFCEj+48qNPH4EFmRepNoT30ni         fuNA5yO8oUrgv1NXidS4IITyFuoY+1mUKya/8=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930908170606y144a3d4dpf759a639dde53377@mail.gmail.com>
References: <4de8c3930908111633t70fa8100u9c70a627b8c2e624@mail.gmail.com>	 <96f789a60908141050l7c255608j43024d359e92c766@mail.gmail.com>	 <eaae9f080908150435s34f68150rc52c247c524dc018@mail.gmail.com>	 <96f789a60908170436r75d52140t6ff1edb85b74c7b3@mail.gmail.com>	 <4de8c3930908170606y144a3d4dpf759a639dde53377@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:18:15 -0400
Message-ID: <96f789a60908170618v44fd011fx46c7b91c113170ad@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: from core to exosphere
From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Length: 1211
Lines: 35

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 9:06 AM, tijlan<jbotijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2009/8/17 Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>:
>> On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 7:35 AM, tijlan<jbotijlan@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> 2009/8/14 Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
>>>>

>>>
>>
>> But [moi] aren't parts of a whole (even if I was inclined to used mo'i
>> with non-numbers, which I'm personally not), si'e would be.
>
> "si'e" would have been an alternative if it had a rafsi.

  Right, you would have been forced to use zei if you had gone that route.

>
>>  I'd also
>> disgaree that glavacri would only imply, e.g. air in a balloon, since
>> it does have a "planet" piece. But even besides all that, why not use
>> glavarsenta, etc. since are specifically describing layers of the
>> atmosphere?
>
> Yes, I had given it some thought. But the crust, the mantle, and the
> core are also layers. If we are to have "glavarsenta", it would make
> more sense to have "jduro'isenta" instead of "jduro'i". I'm happy with
> either one. If you think "glavarsenta" and "jduro'isenta" are better,
> I'll go for that.
>

("jduroksenta", actually, but yes, I would personally think those better.)

                   --gejyspa