Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:08:25 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mi8UU-0003R0-9b; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:08:20 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:07:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mi8Ta-0003Qs-EX for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:07:23 -0700 Received: from mail-vw0-f193.google.com ([209.85.212.193]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Mi8TW-0003Pr-TG for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:07:22 -0700 Received: by vws31 with SMTP id 31so2154970vws.28 for ; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:07:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0kaFKbFsMZBRqnobR4PrjiIPgaH86Rq95NKYLKOn7bA=; b=qQJo/UjqfS2UXASVLOYmBjhe+lSLbdPXpFX0Ll29k7Xq2YuqPEFp+Qu5mElFvOAiNL l9YY6ifetelImKoO8V1ExI3VpSCDN0RqDclOTqzQio8a3k5j7AA8hSYPM942sayG6m6W 78Y+sM27WM9tyztyLY0QcNJbg5UAaa/iBtMfE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=oHNPBR6mH02Whzf2kX3cfpwvj6AeNq56IMqv7F1oTvFGrUcnXhDjRd5G/A0Q2g++i3 ExeP+lKNy4xUs04b9TkeN6YigNoBCF3YZ9t2tPqxpXRqLqFL0DEQKv01R9n1Bmwxqvv5 DoA6Tn2NPPv5ktCBSF/3LXw6FcpDVnA6IcHl4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.127.18 with SMTP id z18mr9416648ybc.61.1251731232235; Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:07:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <905996.61419.qm@web88006.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <905996.61419.qm@web88006.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:07:12 -0400 Message-ID: <96f789a60908310807w70775f54wca81f1912292ca4b@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: tcan,AN From: Michael Turniansky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 470 Lines: 16 On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 10:20 AM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > Can anybody enlighten me as to why tcan,AN is rejected as a cmene by jbovlaste? > > totus > Because jbovlaste is wrong? By why do you want the comma anyhow? As Chapter 3, section 3 says: "Such a comma is written to separate syllables, but indicates that there must be no pause between them, in contrast to the period" So tcan,AN and tcanAN are exactly the same... --gejyspa