Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:50:55 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MmoXR-000759-Qc; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:50:44 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:49:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MmoWg-000751-Dc for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:49:54 -0700 Received: from web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com ([206.190.37.188]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MmoWb-00074c-Vh for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:49:54 -0700 Received: (qmail 6183 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Sep 2009 12:49:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1252846183; bh=BcJ0CBZb2GPD+C1cb0yT7yi4tTpFu6U/KJwKl0QGLDo=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=jctJVtfUyS6tpGsn5RVUSqMKP752Ythy028ZeiQFj4uirEdtYSXCXGemEGIOSbwtjUO0nAdIWe1kkihsDvpejWiqE+kdIXZYF3Dwrl9fZQwtVrePDDse8yr/xbGDdj7DbGYqUUSc9qZzcpsmnWl1HQ4sfZyv5PFYjSCIx9GQCeY= DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=wAULT4YUXVyYnyGTOOTFeaKBhYt2y3mpaKkb6HhMP7pJaAgR/LsPDQm8TvXnSkGbvM31TjUv0uLP75temeoaGZgUbHiew0jSMMKJaGuuTT6Tj8hQysTHLK49ZeHMTl1Ro22eb8Ld7rdXkMmcNq3fjfOyR8h5xmFGGrEL5LPcdzY=; Message-ID: <221948.4341.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: KfL32MwVM1l5vzvIgIxqsmKf0FS3MKbOc2QArdylm.tseZD9uRC6uSKMNWpIVL4qnYSJwykwYiyw_6ko6QUuGloh_a0aVNV8_tbQGRZU.PSH.Dot0Whi4Zpq8a5oe8yJ6541jnkPvPWyg0NbxlbeSBWJGEr8lA5SyLuebyVrxWZF5ExfhltOk2rKmuDbEVnaNXQBNYek9csHVCF6SWZcckdhOLOOYV4lGMwgbTWtInRhqav36w3czkh2KmoELe51wDjmyRwZifNerXjINEg0aKAZzMSjt5nILopJkuydduzvhdnuFfnv5AJxL1TSroIcQ1eR3OO_bBQ6qDwd04r73QNyxBhyiaASdSSGyVBbsVU- Received: from [99.229.170.85] by web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:49:43 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/157.18 YahooMailWebService/0.7.338.2 References: <200909130734.12538.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 05:49:43 -0700 (PDT) From: "A. PIEKARSKI" Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: natlang variants To: jbovlaste@lojban.org In-Reply-To: <200909130734.12538.phma@phma.optus.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: totus@rogers.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 426 Lines: 21 ----- Original Message ---- > From: Pierre Abbat > To: jbovlaste@lojban.org > Sent: Sunday, September 13, 2009 7:34:11 AM > Subject: [jbovlaste] natlang variants > > How should we handle natlang variant spellings? I just added "arxokuna" > for "raccoon", but the English word is already entered as "racoon", so I > changed it. > By the way, how and why did you come up with {arxokuna}? totus