Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 09:25:58 -0700
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 18:24:02 +0200
From: Arnt Richard Johansen <arj@nvg.org>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: doi ARJ
Message-ID: <20090913162402.GZ2685@nvg.org>
References: <4de8c3930909130857i2bbdb6afyd6cc97fd3a3452b5@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4de8c3930909130857i2bbdb6afyd6cc97fd3a3452b5@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Length: 1101
Lines: 26

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 05:57:35PM +0200, tijlan wrote:
> Could you please enlighten me on how i messed up on 'almost all' of
> the recent changes i did to jbovlaste? What is incorrect about
> "bapli", for instance?

My apologies for the outburst. Your edits are mostly sound, and I appreciate that. But on that day there were some very odd edits that made me concerned (actually only two, but it seemed much more at the time):

On lamji:
   Word: immediate, In Sense: happening right away
But "lamji" refers to something that is next to something else in a sequence, not something that happens right away.

On bapli:
   Place Keywords:
   Word: effect, In Sense: result, For Place: 1
But the x1 of bapli is not an effect, it is more like a cause. If anything in bapli is an effect, it is the x2.

Soon after that, I discovered your earlier edit for culno, which is equally perplexing:
   Word: whole, In Sense: entirety, For Place: 1
Was this change meant to be on mulno?

-- 
Arnt Richard Johansen                                http://arj.nvg.org/
Vacuum cleaners suck. Kings rule. Ice is cool.