Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:57:07 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([64.81.66.169]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MsKT0-0001Ml-AW; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:56:59 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:56:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MsKSL-0001MB-Fi for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:56:13 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.122]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1MsKSE-0001Ky-PW for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 10:56:13 -0700 Received: from chausie ([71.75.215.96]) by cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20090928175600121.WOSJ19321@cdptpa-omta04.mail.rr.com> for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 17:56:00 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E413F0C for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:55:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] valid words that vlatai thinks aren't Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2009 13:55:55 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200909281355.56485.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 628 Lines: 14 Some weeks ago I entered the Lojbanized Latin names of the months (just the currently used names). "martio", "prilio", "madjio", "djunio", and "djulio" were rejected. There's a bug in vlatai which calls a fu'ivla invalid if changing a diphthong that can occur in fu'ivla but not lujvo to one that can occur in lujvo turns it into a lujvo (such as "marti'o"). Vlatai considers "mercedonio", which also ends in the diphthong "io", to be valid. (lo mercedonio cu se setca be fi le latmo veldetri be'o masti pu la .iulius.) Is anyone planning to fix vlatai or change the way jbovlaste decides if a word is valid? Pierre