Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 04 Dec 2009 09:09:40 -0800
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :content-type;        b=HEjDlvwKBOKHepS4jIMGoKivWmlyaaJsJM291fx6akyH2NNQ0W/Xe4I2erlNekgaAu         /KIDBCERbIT+dhDi0V6VAWmCQ8GF5hvnSTOIkCrEVyAFugzSl9NJpwc8cQB/I5aGRT9+         0Jzwm1fnZ0qqJDxTecpUq+sj0aKBhDE1aQN2c=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <40b71af30912040818g557da20an36397ee345d8e3d9@mail.gmail.com>
References: <40b71af30912040818g557da20an36397ee345d8e3d9@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 12:08:31 -0500
Message-ID: <5715b9300912040908g3d43c4aq9adcd83fdaec67a7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Fwd: fi'e or fi'i or other? (duplicate of a message 	sent to lojban-list)
From: Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0cd3ae80481d840479ea2838
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Length: 2932
Lines: 72

--000e0cd3ae80481d840479ea2838
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

No, I think everything is ok.  cmavo are different from rafsi. rafsi are not
stand-alone words and will never been seen by
 themselves.  For this reason it is ok that {fi'e} is {finti}'s modal
because {fi'e} as the rafsi of {finpe} will never be seen by itself, it will
always be in a lujvo with other rafsi.

I feel like I've seen things like this before where it was not a big deal
(for the above reason).

On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Frank <frankdmartinez@gmail.com> wrote:

> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Frank <frankdmartinez@gmail.com>
> Date: 2009/12/4
> Subject: fi'e or fi'i or other?
> To: lojban-list@lojban.org
>
>
> coi rodo
>     I noticed the xml from jbovlaste states fi'e is "finti modal, 1st place
> (creator) created by ...".  However, fi'e is also a rafsi for finpe.  Should
> the "finti modal ..." actually refer to fi'i, the rafsi of finti?  If so,
> what of the fact the file states fi'i is a vocative indicative of
> hospitality/inhospitality?
>
> mi'e xuinkrbin.
>
>

--000e0cd3ae80481d840479ea2838
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

No, I think everything is ok. =A0cmavo are different from rafsi. rafsi are =
not stand-alone words and will never been seen by<div>=A0themselves. =A0For=
 this reason it is ok that {fi&#39;e} is {finti}&#39;s modal because {fi=
9;e} as the rafsi of {finpe} will never be seen by itself, it will always b=
e in a lujvo with other rafsi.</div>
<div><br></div><div>I feel like I&#39;ve seen things like this before where=
 it was not a big deal (for the above reason).<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_q=
uote">On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Frank <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=
=3D"mailto:frankdmartinez@gmail.com">frankdmartinez@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span=
> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">---------- Forwa=
rded message ----------<br>From: <b class=3D"gmail_sendername">Frank</b> <s=
pan dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:frankdmartinez@gmail.com" target=3D"_=
blank">frankdmartinez@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
Date: 2009/12/4<br>

Subject: fi&#39;e or fi&#39;i or other?<br>To: <a href=3D"mailto:lojban-lis=
t@lojban.org" target=3D"_blank">lojban-list@lojban.org</a><br><br><br>coi r=
odo<div>=A0=A0 =A0I noticed the xml from jbovlaste states fi&#39;e is &quot=
;finti modal, 1st place (creator) created by ...&quot;. =A0However, fi&#39;=
e is also a rafsi for finpe. =A0Should the &quot;finti modal ...&quot; actu=
ally refer to fi&#39;i, the rafsi of finti? =A0If so, what of the fact the =
file states fi&#39;i is a vocative indicative of hospitality/inhospitality?=
</div>


<div><br></div><div>mi&#39;e xuinkrbin.</div>
</div><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>

--000e0cd3ae80481d840479ea2838--