Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:57:52 -0800
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;  s=s1024; d=rogers.com;  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;  b=byt9E6svwNUeDso3pnVIxerVxDtCklHWQ+facPf0Atf4gjggBPuT5e4u8QjIbJJ/FTfQJK1jsfhPevGLQXkyQfgYfLQ5S3hLEtXfnnX+5g8yYm9yj1IW0ZqRtNI1i9iUq/hU0TKTPdGXLNaYLQ7gz2AdHE72HhUBQrsX1K/7C3k=;
Message-ID: <830545.9772.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <316431.55321.qm@web88004.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201002140759.09255.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Sun, 14 Feb 2010 05:56:52 -0800 (PST)
From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: bikspu biksku capsidba'u pipkla
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <201002140759.09255.phma@phma.optus.nu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Length: 649
Lines: 30


> 
> On Saturday 13 February 2010 16:07:45 A. PIEKARSKI wrote:
> 
> capsidba'u(snarl/growl)
>
> b1 capsidba'u s2 s3
> b1 
> snarls/growls the threat of idea/action s2 at audience s3

What veljvo are 
> you thinking of? This word decomposes to "ckape stidi bacru", 
but to me 
> "snarl" or "growl' denotes a tone of voice, not a dangerous 
suggestion. And 
> a snarl or growl can be a wordless selcmo as well as a 
> 
sentence.

You are right to question it, Pierre.  I forgot about the gloss.  One of 
reasons that beings growl or snarl is to threaten or initimidate.  So the 
gloss here should have been:

growl; make threatening sound

totus