Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:02:56 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkFwn-0003oh-U8; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:02:36 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:01:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkFw4-0003oa-L0 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:01:48 -0800 Received: from mail-fx0-f217.google.com ([209.85.220.217]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkFw0-0003oP-8X for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:01:48 -0800 Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so5062552fxm.4 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:01:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:received:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Wjm6UP2fgbFQmYxVYYLPKjQzsmy3Pu0fX1SSVcjauT0=; b=D6bBMlRwsF2XAQswhUF4TtHCTdGxfgRnLk+L8gNuIccGYdCgQOoYeJAWA/8yL6RLYw qkFTbPN2KgGdwOf1AFfrfU5ltlhfkLZCnDytCrXT74iaJ3rD033tcMwM7FamteNz6ARo xwGp92uGaI0kTCrCMhsCxcUYBSAukHAjBT0GY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=RqCRZyUaYMEY0g3rRV2pV1IXqOFj09hZNs0kpe7MPjsuqHyeyZhelD+/HwAa9ZlkbW sG3A0G6UswTg9ydVx+iKrSi4KhuKOzs15WGUxbDLtjX9djuIlSt7a2C6QdiNJZ3OyPc6 obYcxIMzEP0ohuEkEFjVLCJum+nLYcgZfIT+0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.143.71 with SMTP id t7mr7276561fau.38.1267012897110; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:01:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9301002232332m32ce5c4ep8bc04f98a4add7c4@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9301002231246w218ac892lb1b4f5cd15e36b75@mail.gmail.com> <201002240035.18280.phma@phma.optus.nu> <23f4e3391002232254y656b226epa409c002fde7adb8@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002232332m32ce5c4ep8bc04f98a4add7c4@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 12:01:37 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 32d937707210f779 Message-ID: <4de8c3931002240401w52945f9du6db99bacc6dab7c1@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: new word: prolijmo'a From: tijlan To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jbotijlan@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 692 Lines: 18 On 24 February 2010 07:32, Luke Bergen wrote: >> Luke: Isn't the normal thing to withdraw your vote from the old word, >> then create the new word and vote for that? Hopefully no one else >> voted for prolijmo'a yet. > I don't know, this is my first attempt at creating a new word in jbovlaste. > Ok, I just voted it down, it's at -2 at the moment.  I like the {kuclijmo'a} > one, but like David says, it could mean many other things (like a tic tac > toe looking pattern).  But I really don't like what a mouthful > {kurfa'ekucmo'a} is.  hmmm. To begin with, why not {dasri} (2-dimensional stripe) rather than {linji} (1-dimensional line)? mu'o mi'e tijlan