Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:23:02 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkI8O-0007mT-9g; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:22:42 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:21:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkI7U-0007mN-Ol for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:21:44 -0800 Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.212.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NkI7P-0007lX-G2 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:21:44 -0800 Received: by vws17 with SMTP id 17so929375vws.40 for ; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:21:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=RWwxCB7dofZvt6N3EKtScUv9TQBxP5ygiDJt+kjp6DI=; b=YLxZmkezKOZGTdK9BuFU6nHFOtP+QcnaZQqM9wx+1svigblgKmFNyYs1GNyDFO2nkO /6hsmFCddeQjHeYfAPlMFYRy9H7kfNPTBXS7k5SbPDLd7d3UyLNLT8WILIn5vkC1hD0W XFETDrpI+GxXnCYipDTjpG+hfoEwIJayDemM8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=bkUd6Pj3C5XqWcjMb02Y82Sj2vCJWswTL7ZLmIApRkNzVlkUbRvRT+FIVzQJhvZ3c/ Wmpap4a1B6xDdCevrU7ErRb463+8+z7pkrmYTpUEpWDOhWPDb1WeB/WzB3ex18JmN15/ dlrN/zzXqKjoobkQRXjTceqVIq91gSbEoHGqg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.126.167 with SMTP id c39mr2986976vcs.131.1267021292567; Wed, 24 Feb 2010 06:21:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4de8c3931002240401w52945f9du6db99bacc6dab7c1@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9301002231246w218ac892lb1b4f5cd15e36b75@mail.gmail.com> <201002240035.18280.phma@phma.optus.nu> <23f4e3391002232254y656b226epa409c002fde7adb8@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002232332m32ce5c4ep8bc04f98a4add7c4@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3931002240401w52945f9du6db99bacc6dab7c1@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:21:32 -0500 Message-ID: <5715b9301002240621kc509cd3u8140a30e162c1902@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: new word: prolijmo'a From: Luke Bergen To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e6d2755e10fd290480596208 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 2605 Lines: 74 --0016e6d2755e10fd290480596208 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Another excellent point. The more I think about this the more I realize that maybe I should study myself to a higher level before I start adding to jbovlaste On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:01 AM, tijlan wrote: > On 24 February 2010 07:32, Luke Bergen wrote: > >> Luke: Isn't the normal thing to withdraw your vote from the old word, > >> then create the new word and vote for that? Hopefully no one else > >> voted for prolijmo'a yet. > > I don't know, this is my first attempt at creating a new word in > jbovlaste. > > Ok, I just voted it down, it's at -2 at the moment. I like the > {kuclijmo'a} > > one, but like David says, it could mean many other things (like a tic tac > > toe looking pattern). But I really don't like what a mouthful > > {kurfa'ekucmo'a} is. hmmm. > > To begin with, why not {dasri} (2-dimensional stripe) rather than > {linji} (1-dimensional line)? > > > mu'o mi'e tijlan > > > > --0016e6d2755e10fd290480596208 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Another excellent point. =A0The more I think about this the more I realize = that maybe I should study myself to a higher level before I start adding to= jbovlaste

On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:01 A= M, tijlan <jbot= ijlan@gmail.com> wrote:
On 24 February 2010 07:32= , Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmai= l.com> wrote:
>>=A0Luke: Isn't the normal thing to withdraw your vote from the = old word,
>> then create the new word and vote for that? Hopefully no one else<= br> >> voted for prolijmo'a yet.
> I don't know, this is my first attempt at creating a new word in j= bovlaste.
> Ok, I just voted it down, it's at -2 at the moment. =A0I like the = {kuclijmo'a}
> one, but like David says, it could mean many other things (like a tic = tac
> toe looking pattern). =A0But I really don't like what a mouthful > {kurfa'ekucmo'a} is. =A0hmmm.

To begin with, why not {dasri} (2-dimensional stripe) rather than
{linji} (1-dimensional line)?


mu'o mi'e tijlan




--0016e6d2755e10fd290480596208--