Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:57:00 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NlbCp-0007bf-KQ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:56:42 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:55:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NlbC1-0007bY-6b for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:55:49 -0800 Received: from mail-pz0-f173.google.com ([209.85.222.173]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <00ai99@gmail.com>) id 1NlbBy-0007av-77 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:55:49 -0800 Received: by pzk3 with SMTP id 3so1074952pzk.24 for ; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:55:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qcJwbMC4K9MDoWXMXhxXeNIkmHKbLP7jYCesI/UxUhE=; b=MpNWw5orj/q0f4aMdatde88kh2o0egrB9w//LcANrXjZDKvVUEtB/3z4vyhGEhyEZt 8xoj6fU+Hh8RyVUiTYHbL9xVk0+gia01ZyLBDwVD/0K1yQPK9ax/6zug9wfzwmLsdOce nhI+aQS0a8jwra+fhPSiDDM35BHCEtHgB+l/k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KOVj55ZLZEA3PNC2r/pQ3O0ZPz9LoMNGOMsGHEueZnRyZJzNw8mhyRe0Hx3WMwcRuK tw8GRu+w8jkmulS2cUq04HDvz2h4HszZoahvC3M0QNTzPF+JVHwzv5uTPhQvPQaZaNqa 3ugDhhpXDO7XSpkCWPl+h5OCcFC4lCTaioA9w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.247.20 with SMTP id u20mr1503838wfh.209.1267332940184; Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:55:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5715b9301002271647p832f33fjcdc199987a4a8826@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9301002231246w218ac892lb1b4f5cd15e36b75@mail.gmail.com> <23f4e3391002232254y656b226epa409c002fde7adb8@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002232332m32ce5c4ep8bc04f98a4add7c4@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3931002240401w52945f9du6db99bacc6dab7c1@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002240621kc509cd3u8140a30e162c1902@mail.gmail.com> <23f4e3391002241425o170edc5dge38d323e6efd720a@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3931002251116g7ed835a0r680c29d0b7ca37e1@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002271026m1aa00bd8xd4ca1179ae6c6efb@mail.gmail.com> <23f4e3391002271407w151d01d3kf65a3c16e073709e@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002271647p832f33fjcdc199987a4a8826@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:25:40 +1030 Message-ID: <23f4e3391002272055r61ea3d28p48f7a6e2938dcf7f@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: new word: prolijmo'a From: David Gowers <00ai99@gmail.com> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: 00ai99@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1498 Lines: 30 On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 11:17 AM, Luke Bergen wrote: >>checkboards, uneven and even grids, bricks or pavement tiling, tartan, >>certain carpet patterns, zigzag stitching, pixel art tiles >>(particularly the older, low res ones)... > So these would be those words that I was talking about when I said >> Maybe later if someone wants to describe that pattern that a tic-tac-toe >> board makes they could make a bigger lujvo that pulls {linji} into it > I think checker boards, pixel art tiles, and a brick wall all exhibit a > pattern that is a variation on the basic, standard check pattern. Don't agree on pixel art tiles. In general, any seamlessly wrapping piece of pixel art qualifies as kurmo'a, because , even if it depicts a circle, it does so by the composition of rectangular/square elements in a grid (where the pixels are often shown large enough to see individual ones clearly.) That's not really very similar to a checkerboard at all IMO. > So, is it > fair to say that the more general/standard the idea, the smaller the lujvo > can comfortably be?  While the more specific/non-standard/varied ideas get > longer lujvo? > e.g.  {cicti'a} = "storm" but when we want to get more specific we have > {bifyvilcarvi} = "windstorm" > So for instance, I wanted to define the word originally because I wanted to > translated "handsome checked suit".  That seems like a pretty general use of > the word to me. Fair enough. I probably need to do more reading of CLL.