Return-path: X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:49:59 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NmVHp-0005Uq-5Q; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:49:37 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:48:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NmVHF-0005Tj-Vk for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:48:58 -0800 Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.212.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NmVH9-0005Lx-GT for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:48:56 -0800 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so50973vws.40 for ; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:48:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=NYVQffLIIPGzH0Kwa3V0vBpbBbfs3iYq1E39o8VHWU4=; b=l+ittFz7JuIeH7RGrYIZ3DwgxdFBes111a4SelpiiOi7G6qOhuPB8BEWBEAAr2hDZS utOFvcC/G0YMdd2891zKVkfYjzaRNt6oqCpyQ7dBg6vU8bOt4y6COdLljWDAku/QZp1I Xug4IOBzQ2TQsPCFCWlit8rLolQBFUgY/ykoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=D8zrUYdwO/Vb7fftN59sRUrfF8Um0AZmgIRc7ewvUmBFPpl+4jstVmGdo7BqWmDSg7 Xd6fCLzsuE5hKmQAAQgRz7pDkI/wLCcmDpQb2xIlKX2FFDsQu0WghT1ELO4PbaG3Tki8 6bnjI1RFhu4DU9ojklmuUOaXsue40QPFQHxf0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.107.72 with SMTP id a8mr4294650vcp.92.1267548524609; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:48:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <96f789a61003020829s3b319c49kaa48a934d7b54599@mail.gmail.com> References: <5715b9301002231246w218ac892lb1b4f5cd15e36b75@mail.gmail.com> <201002240035.18280.phma@phma.optus.nu> <23f4e3391002232254y656b226epa409c002fde7adb8@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002232332m32ce5c4ep8bc04f98a4add7c4@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3931002240401w52945f9du6db99bacc6dab7c1@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002240621kc509cd3u8140a30e162c1902@mail.gmail.com> <23f4e3391002241425o170edc5dge38d323e6efd720a@mail.gmail.com> <4de8c3931002251116g7ed835a0r680c29d0b7ca37e1@mail.gmail.com> <5715b9301002271026m1aa00bd8xd4ca1179ae6c6efb@mail.gmail.com> <96f789a61003020829s3b319c49kaa48a934d7b54599@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 11:48:44 -0500 Message-ID: <5715b9301003020848h39229a52w214b9dc1ffbc0039@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: new word: prolijmo'a From: Luke Bergen To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00c09f8de4948b87800480d42375 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 4593 Lines: 96 --00c09f8de4948b87800480d42375 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Awesome. Thanks for taking the burden of responsibility off my shoulders gejyspa :) I'm going over to jbovlaste now to up-vote kurmo'a On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 11:29 AM, Michael Turniansky wrote: > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Luke Bergen wrote: > >> After reading through the chapter on lujvo making in the CLL I'm beginning >> to wonder how important it really is to perfectly describe exactly what you >> want to mean. >> >> If I were making a tanru to mean "checker pattern" I might need to use >> vlina kurfa dasri morna. But if the true meaning of a lujvo comes from >> it's definition and not strictly it's component gismu (we remove {sel} and >> {nun} all the time) then do we really need to describe it perfectly with >> ba'u 50+ gismu? Also, it seems to me that if only a couple of gismu are >> necessary to describe an idea without other ideas intersecting with it, why >> add more? Is there anything more obvious than "checker pattern" for kurfa >> morna to mean? Maybe later if someone wants to describe that pattern that a >> tic-tac-toe board makes they could make a bigger lujvo that pulls {linji} >> into it. But do we need to make every lujvo as big as the biggest lujvo >> necessary? >> >> Therefore, unless many people object, I'm going to create a new word >> kurmo'a (I've already voted down prolijmo'a). I'll wait for a bit in case >> anybody is violently opposed to kurmo'a >> >> >> Feel free to try. I quietly created that 4 days before this letter, > when you wrote your original proposal, which I voted down. Feel free to > vote thumbs up on it, though ;-) > --gejyspa > > --00c09f8de4948b87800480d42375 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Awesome. =A0Thanks for taking the burden of responsibility off my shoulders= gejyspa :)=A0

I'm going over to jbovlaste now to up= -vote kurmo'a

On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at = 11:29 AM, Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com> wrote:


On Sat, Feb 27, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Luke Bergen &l= t;lukeabergen@gm= ail.com> wrote:
After reading through the chapter on lujvo making in the CLL I'm beginn= ing to wonder how important it really is to perfectly describe exactly what= you want to mean.

If I were making a tanru to mean &quo= t;checker pattern" I might need to use vlina kurfa dasri morna. =A0But = if the true meaning of a lujvo comes from it's definition and not stric= tly it's component gismu (we remove {sel} and {nun} all the time) then = do we really need to describe it perfectly with ba'u 50+ gismu? =A0Also= , it seems to me that if only a couple of gismu are necessary to describe a= n idea without other ideas intersecting with it, why add more? =A0Is there = anything more obvious than "checker pattern" for kurfa morna to m= ean? =A0Maybe later if someone wants to describe that pattern that a tic-ta= c-toe board makes they could make a bigger lujvo that pulls {linji} into it= . =A0But do we need to make every lujvo as big as the biggest lujvo necessa= ry?=A0

Therefore, unless many people object, I'= ;m going to create a new word kurmo'a (I've already voted down prol= ijmo'a). =A0I'll wait for a bit in case anybody is violently oppose= d to kurmo'a


=A0 Feel free to try.= =A0 I quietly created that 4 days before this letter, when you wrote your o= riginal proposal, which I voted down.=A0 Feel free to vote thumbs up on it,= though ;-)
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 --gejyspa


--00c09f8de4948b87800480d42375--