Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.0 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.0 (2010-01-18) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:17:53 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3ESB-0001MX-Lx; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:17:28 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3ERM-0001ML-G7 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:16:33 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1O3ERD-0001LZ-RM for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 13:16:31 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=W/hBQ06qw3sd7s/ivY51N5seo0sJ1CJjfZA0aPhrSFo= c=1 sm=0 a=ORa4HqFjfvEA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=ITGCJgwGTuG7H/gKGaarIQ==:17 a=sxo-wHRmQpuRcWQksOgA:9 a=zlAr3qDwIGnWIkFvi6m2XpCzhGsA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=ITGCJgwGTuG7H/gKGaarIQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 71.71.198.100 Received: from [71.71.198.100] ([71.71.198.100:33390] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id 71/65-13915-0171ACB4; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 20:16:17 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71A01BD8 for ; Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:16:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: farklaji Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2010 16:15:48 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <201004170649.26885.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201004171615.55969.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1206 Lines: 34 On Saturday 17 April 2010 14:48:22 Yoav Nir wrote: > If you've just coined farklaji as runway, then there are no farklajis that > aren't runways. A lujvo often doesn't have the same circumscription as its gloss. A farklaji is a street of a class that is identified by direction. Runways are such streets, but there may be others, just as tenors are somewhat slow oscillators (mlisnosli), but so are some radio stations. > But wouldn't it make sense, since runways are generally called by their > numbers, to have the number as the first place of farklaji. As in: > > li xa farklaji la sxifol - 6 is a runway in Schiphol Numbers aren't runways. Runways are designated by numbers, which indicate directions. > So we have: f1 is a runway in (airport) k2 > > As for x3, the runways are for accessing both the air and the land. So > perhaps we should use {lo vacri} or {lo tumla} for the third position, > depending on whether this runway is used for landing or taking off (they > usually use one direction for each, no?) Whether runway 6 or runway 24 is used for landing or taking off depends on the wind direction. Pierre -- Jews use a lunisolar calendar; Muslims use a solely lunar calendar.