Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Jun 2010 10:25:51 -0700
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;  s=s1024; d=rogers.com;  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;  b=YtoxwelsJ8otzLn8ozWC59TGw7OaLJUEzmW8swerj9o4okG405BNAa8SS05OXSRGqKMLadOP/hms5ORvif3W1jLoTYRSXg797LAJrIOOdr66Q4Wy04slUWioRCy0t0IcECnp5bYIgNM2QvTpRL3kz+NoSqV4/qgkwPluIpQgblw=;
Message-ID: <941895.9144.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2010 10:23:51 -0700 (PDT)
From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Boat rods/poles
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Spam_score: 0.7
X-Spam_score_int: 7
X-Spam_bar: /
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  coi ro do Boats have a number of rods and poles of various
    kinds that are an important part of their 'construction'. I think it makes
    sense to develop lujvo for them as a set so as to minimize future confusion.
    [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (0.7 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [68.142.237.94 listed in list.dnswl.org]
  0.8 BAYES_50               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60%
                             [score: 0.5000]
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU          Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's
                             domain
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
 -0.1 DKIM_VALID             Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: totus@rogers.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
X-list: jbovlaste
X-Spam_score: 1.9
X-Spam_score_int: 19
X-Spam_bar: +
X-Spam_report: Spam detection software, running on the system "chain.digitalkingdom.org", has
 identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
 has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
 similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
 the administrator of that system for details.
 
 Content preview:  coi ro do Boats have a number of rods and poles of various
    kinds that are an important part of their 'construction'. I think it makes
    sense to develop lujvo for them as a set so as to minimize future confusion.
    [...] 
 
 Content analysis details:   (1.9 points, 5.0 required)
 
  pts rule name              description
 ---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
  3.7 SINGLE_HEADER_3K       A single header contains 3K-4K characters
 -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE     RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, low
                             trust
                             [68.142.237.94 listed in list.dnswl.org]
 -1.9 BAYES_00               BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1%
                             [score: 0.0000]
  0.1 DKIM_SIGNED            Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid
  0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
Content-Length: 757
Lines: 34

coi ro do

Boats have a number of rods and poles of various 
kinds that are an important part of their 'construction'.

I think it makes sense to develop lujvo for them as 
a set so as to minimize future confusion.

Here is my proposal:

  
1) g1=l2=b3 blocpuga'a g2 l2 b1 (oar)
from
g1=l2=b3 grana g2 gi'e selcpu l1 l3 gi'e jai terblo b1 b2
 
2)  g1=c2=b3 bloca'ega'a g2 c2 b1 (punting pole)
from
g1=c2=b3 grana g2 gi'e selca'e c1 c3 gi'e jai terblo b1 b2
 
3)  g1=b3 blofanga'a g2 f1 f3=b1 (mast)
from
g1=s1=b3 grana g2 gi'e sarji lonu f1 falnu be f2 f3 kei s3 s4 gi'e jai terblo b1 b2
 
4)  g1=b3 blomatryga'a g2 m1 m2=b2 (propeller shaft)
from
g1=p2=b3 grana g2 gi'e selpi'o lonu m1 matra m2 kei p3 gi'e jai terblo b1 b2
 
Comments, please!
 
totus