Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:39:03 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OYJDK-0007Eo-UB; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:38:38 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:37:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OYJCg-0007Eh-Jr for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:37:51 -0700 Received: from mail-vw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.212.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OYJCb-0007EI-JQ for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:37:50 -0700 Received: by vws15 with SMTP id 15so4838908vws.40 for ; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:37:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=m7mV/awsIm+CPsxv/ZzAb3RSg4nS7qGHzk7sE/6CXy0=; b=RWOh9zKhgbgIQ881IhY7bfNwaz8ynuAoanLtthEhUxwfwTIlsr3Mk8pe3yuYPwb8Q7 rrEQwr6aY9xsqgCI7w7c98u41KZemgx1yHA9Qd457jaJ8vkvKjacyjSBICVJYnGOYWhe puvzrYq+HNUX4Ihx/wop7+ArO8FUuZ09qeZCo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=hMhz9nBax73Gb5jFLR4Y56OoLN9l9h+HISLk6OClRfyep7uk10S0ZTSvBLtj574HqW LBb3Zpw0zrwF8BKtI7r+EMZ/dorxqmHBmrFUMZcKU+/zhORnF/yuvBL0/pEk7rkoU8lw qSm57QSPjN0/R2FgFPAPvksaM1K3juy9Td7q0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.49.212 with SMTP id w20mr6916090vcf.246.1278941858557; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.165.206 with HTTP; Mon, 12 Jul 2010 06:37:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <267856.88875.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <130555.40063.qm@web88006.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20100712115758.GA13842@lake.fysh.org> <267856.88875.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2010 09:37:38 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 03 From: Luke Bergen To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e64768ec2af11a048b30dbd9 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 3072 Lines: 98 --0016e64768ec2af11a048b30dbd9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I thought calling a mans facial hair "whiskers" was just a way to be funny or something. Male facial hair is not whiskers. I'm pretty sure that no human possesses whiskers. I think I would tend to agree with zefram here. On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > > > > > A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > > >1) > > >k1 zbikre k2=n2 > > >k1 are the whiskers of k2=n2 > > >from > > >k1 kerfa k2 lo nazbi be n2 n3 ku k3 > > > > The distinguishing feature of whiskers is not their location but their > > function: they are sensory organs. This distinguishes them from most > > nasal hair, and indeed they are found not only on faces but also on > > forelegs. I suggest {gaskre} ({ganse kerfa}), with a place structure > > such as: > > > > k1=g3 are the whiskers attached to k2=g1 at locus k3 for the > > detection of stimuli g2 under conditions g4 > > > But not all whiskers are sensory hairs (vibrissa). My neighbour has a > few whiskers on his nose, but hardly sensory. {zbikre} would still be > more appropriate. > > However, {gaskre] seems a useful lujvo whose gloss would be: > whisker; sensory hair > > totus > > > > > --0016e64768ec2af11a048b30dbd9 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I thought calling a mans facial hair "whiskers" was just a way to= be funny or something. =A0Male facial hair is not whiskers. =A0I'm pre= tty sure that no human possesses whiskers.

I think I wou= ld tend to agree with zefram here.

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:55 AM, A. PIE= KARSKI <totus@roge= rs.com> wrote:

>
> A. PIEKARSKI wrote:
> >1)
> >k1 zbikre k2=3Dn2
> >k1 are the whiskers of k2=3Dn2
> >from
> >k1 kerfa k2 lo nazbi be n2 n3 ku k3
>
> The distinguishing feature of whiskers is not their location but their=
> function: they are sensory organs.=A0 This distinguishes them from mos= t
> nasal hair, and indeed they are found not only on faces but also on > forelegs.=A0 I suggest {gaskre} ({ganse kerfa}), with a place structur= e
> such as:
>
> =A0=A0=A0 k1=3Dg3 are the whiskers attached to k2=3Dg1 at locus k3 for= the
> =A0=A0=A0 detection of stimuli g2 under conditions g4
>
But not all whiskers are sensory hairs (vibrissa).=A0 My neighb= our has a
few whiskers on his nose, but=A0hardly sensory.=A0 {zbikre} would still be<= br> more appropriate.

However, {gaskre] seems a useful lujvo whose gloss would be:
whisker; sensory hair

totus





--0016e64768ec2af11a048b30dbd9--