Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 07:37:20 -0700
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;        b=KRSodGBT1TJteWfACiQM+90RwzeqxxID5+87YG5iiyJo94HnnfTMSwnzCB1jP8uWp3         Y70pDcY+sGcpQS/aGPkb9iGmzX58E4aT1yohj6rRcuwJJresOyfyXYp+wxiJjqB4Im4u         xUZ1qyUiK/PNvA9fxtM5141lvW+Z47cbNImCk=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTilszzoCzwPPEOctesFAgxMU0td2xv5hw3pD437-@mail.gmail.com>
References: <423185.69906.qm@web88006.mail.re2.yahoo.com>	<AANLkTinJJLMWzI8HmEx8rpj63wjsTJ-gnRIOBt_ByJql@mail.gmail.com>	<568EA804-F736-4E46-BA52-69A9F675FAEC@switchb.org>	<201007140137.01692.phma@phma.optus.nu>	<AANLkTimTGavuIZTOMb6Vw1YpyKAuAWo4dR7FyBR642D8@mail.gmail.com>	<AANLkTinD8khKsyQS48RD6bxrfc5nWKrk-_TJvATMFUV4@mail.gmail.com>	<929237.27373.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com>	<AANLkTilszzoCzwPPEOctesFAgxMU0td2xv5hw3pD437-@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2010 10:36:05 -0400
Message-ID: <AANLkTinapplEYXXgLiVcv3faDZuaSkV2NC9La9MTHTTi@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 04
From: Michael Turniansky <mturniansky@gmail.com>
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Length: 2573
Lines: 82

  He replied... he just accidentally put it in the quoted area... his
reply started with "I agree..." and ended with "totus"
  But as to the issue at hand, I like the current laktytergu'i.  I'm
not sure why you think it doesn't make sense.

            --gejyspa


On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Luke Bergen <lukeabergen@gmail.com> wrote:
> Weird, I didn't see a reply.
> This is what I saw:
>
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:44 AM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> mi se cfipu lo nu do jimpe lo du'u lo kabri be lo litki cu srana lo grana
>>
>> Sorry, I still consider my lojban to be pretty rough.  Basically, what on
>> earth would make me want to refer to a bowl of liquid wax with a wick
>> floating on a piece of buoyant material a "wax rod"?
>>
>> I agree.  But nobody has yet commented on {laktytergu'i} which is already
>> in jbovlaste.
>> That is shown as 'g3=l1 is a candle/wax light with wax source l2'. which
>> seems to be wrong as
>> the x3 of gusni is the source of the light i.e. the burning candle.  So
>> {laktergu'i} should be the candle
>> and lakygu'i the candle light.  Simlarly {ctilytergu'i} would be an oil
>> lamp.
>>
>> totus
>> How about:
>> jelylakse for generic "candle"
>> lakyga'a for the specific kind of jelylakse that is a candle-stick (the
>> hard wax stick type)
>> flujelylakse for the floating candle type
>> ...
>> <rafsi for whatever mechanism the wick uses to burn the fuel>jelylakse for
>> <mechanism the wick uses to burn the fuel> type of jelylakse.
>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Jonathan Jones <eyeonus@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 11:37 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Tuesday 13 July 2010 21:22:01 Kevin Reid wrote:
>>>> > That its fuel is wax, or that its fuel is solid and also forms its
>>>> > mechanical structure?
>>>> >
>>>> > Candles can be made of other materials than wax; for example, tallow
>>>> > and spermaceti, per dict.org. And one could perhaps burn wax in ways
>>>> > which would not qualify for being a candle.
>>>>
>>>> There is a device consisting of a container of a flammable liquid (which
>>>> could
>>>> be wax; there are liquid waxes), with a thing floating on the liquid and
>>>> a
>>>> wick stuck through the thing. Is it a candle?
>>>
>>> la'edi'u .e la'ede'u mintu zo lakyga'a lonu mi jimpe
>>>>
>>>> Pierre
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> mu'o mi'e .aionys.
>>>
>>> .i.a'o.e'e ko klama le bende pe denpa bu
>>>
>>
>
>