Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:57:51 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OwHly-0001l9-HE; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:57:22 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:56:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OwHl0-0001l3-99 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:56:22 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OwHkt-0001kG-6G for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 09:56:22 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=uqrTLNeDnnHeEEhzWge2W4XpJs90mGmxJDRCKFYUEn4= c=1 sm=0 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=mccZOMHJyKji4JRlDqsA:9 a=66rIssAAnia8miMpYNxlC0pHL_IA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:38590] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id F2/90-11162-82C429C4; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 16:56:09 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id F16983EBE for ; Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:56:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: crab Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2010 12:55:40 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <201009161103.17292.phma@phma.optus.nu> <600209.55859.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <600209.55859.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009161255.46392.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 642 Lines: 21 On Thursday 16 September 2010 11:55:23 A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > Why not stick to something generally recognizable > or based on Linnaean? > > fu'ivla type III:    juknrbrakiura > fu'ivla type IV:    barkura/brakiura (yes, they probably need to be > massaged). "braxiura" (I prefer the 'x' since it's from a Greek chi) is perfectly valid. jbofi'e seems to think it's a lujvo (it translates it as "being big ??(s)"), but it's not. I think the set of people who know the scientific name of crabs is much smaller than the set of people who know the Spanish or Arabic name. Pierre -- Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen.