Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:06:23 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0J1R-0000xQ-5D; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:05:57 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:05:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0J0Z-0000x6-Ta for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:05:04 -0700 Received: from mail-px0-f181.google.com ([209.85.212.181]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0J0U-0000va-Ka for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:05:03 -0700 Received: by pxi5 with SMTP id 5so3318145pxi.40 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:04:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ggSckoPqJs53SWen0qHzP0vSwxecM2R2F4xrLVIcRbQ=; b=XDRNr7Zo7nTCHDzLyN5gowkY0Uze0i6+RfmKTtCX5Ty3YvqyVnohox3EXd4gM+t0Jp 8jW8BGE7+NNuvWfsZqs2yq+CPZYka3dmgSK0i4q99VWxPwcPVcUesTggVKPH9uATt5ek WDjJ96Yd7eUW4K0eroYZUjXivDL+OWV1RHcww= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=apm4kxv6HJVQsTOAAQkNNXd8QxdFZ/OkBHj7TKx5Yld7jB8rPgP4or+yARVQxVGTHg 7WPN6n03+5JrjnoPcbMB8vUk6Zi6gE9k5gaB+7XaYIJbuizYdEa9N/VfCVS3bcMb+Zra IHSDwT/N8mQbCMyey2sNXLPDKp2Ae2AARwzqU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.39.21 with SMTP id r21mr6886897wfj.237.1285614292684; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:04:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.184.72 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:04:52 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201009161255.46392.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201009161103.17292.phma@phma.optus.nu> <600209.55859.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201009161255.46392.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:04:52 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: crab From: Michael Turniansky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636e0b7523bcfa004914267df X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 2807 Lines: 66 --001636e0b7523bcfa004914267df Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Thursday 16 September 2010 11:55:23 A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > > Why not stick to something generally recognizable > > or based on Linnaean? > > > > fu'ivla type III: juknrbrakiura > > fu'ivla type IV: barkura/brakiura (yes, they probably need to be > > massaged). > > "braxiura" (I prefer the 'x' since it's from a Greek chi) is perfectly > valid. > jbofi'e seems to think it's a lujvo (it translates it as "being big > ??(s)"), > but it's not. > > I think the set of people who know the scientific name of crabs is much > smaller than the set of people who know the Spanish or Arabic name. > > Pierre > I prefer the following (please insert "zei" between every word, which I have left out for clarity's sake): xamsi jukni fi'o misno srana la merilynd fi'o ku'i citka na'e bo lo cacklu brojdapre no'u la gejyspa mu'a mu'i lo nu lo nu citka lo jukni cu se tolcru --gejyspa --001636e0b7523bcfa004914267df Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Pierre Abbat <= span dir=3D"ltr"><phma@phma.optus.= nu> wrote:
On Thursday 16 September 2010 11:55:23 A. PIEKARSKI wrote= :
> Why not stick to something generally recognizable
> or base= d on Linnaean?
>
> fu'ivla type III:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 jukn= rbrakiura
> fu'ivla type IV:=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 barkura/brakiura (yes, they pro= bably need to be
> massaged).

"braxiura" (I pr= efer the 'x' since it's from a Greek chi) is perfectly valid.jbofi'e seems to think it's a lujvo (it translates it as "be= ing big ??(s)"),
but it's not.

I think the set of people who know the scientific = name of crabs is much
smaller than the set of people who know the Spanis= h or Arabic name.

Pierre
=C2=A0=C2=A0 I prefer the following (please insert "zei" bet= ween every word, which I have left out for clarity's sake):
=C2=A0
xamsi jukni fi'o misno srana la merilynd=C2=A0 fi'o ku'i c= itka na'e bo lo cacklu brojdapre=C2=A0no'u la gejyspa mu'a=C2= =A0mu'i lo nu lo nu=C2=A0citka lo=C2=A0 jukni cu se tolcru
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 --gejyspa

--001636e0b7523bcfa004914267df--