Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:40:52 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxiTi-0007vW-4B; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:40:26 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:39:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxiT4-0007uO-C4 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:39:46 -0700 Received: from mail-ww0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxiSw-0007p7-H4 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:39:45 -0700 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so376757wwb.10 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:39:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=TDNfJ5krM3YmJhVuE6kPp9x86unv5OOxVnDoMnXZc7k=; b=xdApenVQwolks/IVmhrr/DTITC8EMHT6ItPCzx/G4eOrRatT/5p1Ze58tlvHi3EW5w oZVPoXvqhWt5W1BtFmmj3BDfW3ZYHTA6A5Uy3JQdcW02DvrmWlaEtfscYn9oFdp8jq88 ElzqjPpk4Dt7s0jaaYXIMblV0+sOALoPthu0g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=ncZS4nZBngBmRfK0PDbY0GEhuWaf55zH/qbbOL/dLD66/hjAhxqEEM25JjmO689ZB5 PJbkr66SgLgE45WVzuMpC4/Vqouo0WJU+yKDEHNLWJ4VDYgsM3cqC4PMq8kzhMYS/ukt L886cZgFQplEUye5XgAr3tK7nDCreRJlf7oW8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.138.7 with SMTP id y7mr2047345wbt.133.1284997171891; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:39:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.151.203 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 08:39:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201009201112.09884.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <589275.89862.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201009201112.09884.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:39:31 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 10 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: jjllambias@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 917 Lines: 24 On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 12:12 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > > "jbini" means "between"; "jibni" means "near". The worst part is that jbi is the rafsi for jibni, not for jbini. Probably the most confusing pair of gismu, perhaps competing with ractu/ratcu and grana/garna. Related meanings and similar forms. > "jbize'a" has been recently used in the Cauchy sequence thread for "tends to, > has as limit". I don't think that's quite the right word, as the sequence 1, > 1/2, 1/3, ... approaches -0.1, but that is not its limit. Neither is "jimte" > the right word; in mathematics, that means "bound". Maybe "cimnyjbize'a"? I considered that, but the "approaches but doesn't tend to" meaning isn't really used in maths, as far as I know, so I don't really see much of a problem. How does "cimni" change anything anyway? Another thing is that the approach need not be monotonic. mu'o mi'e xorxes