Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:50:37 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxjZ7-0003jN-Fr; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:50:07 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxjYP-0003jA-GI for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:49:21 -0700 Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.123]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OxjY9-0003hj-GL for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:49:21 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=SsAsUFxH7GCXazXoRQ+phCALgYvZXVTLmYsiz8VgUl8= c=1 sm=0 a=oPC7MFcJc-IA:10 a=wPDyFdB5xvgA:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:17 a=uBzOGNE9aRfS-Ea1fbcA:9 a=AQDo-o1r5dQhzBTNukHnOFv5fpAA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=9o99xeNKNPYSmM5t9x5+TQ==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.176.118.168 Received: from [75.176.118.168] ([75.176.118.168:33464] helo=chausie) by cdptpa-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.2.39 r()) with ESMTP id AD/75-06158-A70979C4; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:48:59 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6622A36B for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:48:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 10 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:48:47 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <589275.89862.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201009201112.09884.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009201248.49687.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: phma@phma.optus.nu Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 748 Lines: 21 On Monday 20 September 2010 11:39:31 Jorge Llambías wrote: > The worst part is that jbi is the rafsi for jibni, not for jbini. > > Probably the most confusing pair of gismu, perhaps competing with > ractu/ratcu and grana/garna. Related meanings and similar forms. Other pairs I confuse are jivna/javni (rafsi are jvi/jva) and mulno/culno. > I considered that, but the "approaches but doesn't tend to" meaning > isn't really used in maths, as far as I know, so I don't really see > much of a problem. How does "cimni" change anything anyway? For any epsilon >0, an infinite number of members of the sequence are within epsilon of the limit. They get infinitely close to it. Pierre -- Don't buy a French car in Holland. It may be a citroen.