Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:01:52 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3vie-00025S-3P; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:01:32 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:01:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3viG-00025L-Bh for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:01:08 -0700 Received: from mail-qy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.216.181]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P3viB-00024l-Mx for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:01:08 -0700 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so197045qyk.19 for ; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:00:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=i4Zd++aG2yDNcz34aVUkBv9XxqDbSCzv2/1MeMCURJw=; b=e0ouasxd3N2/Ov+kizODBIQqf3VmG5eJ+I5YInlExmGSWxQE5BLHH75AOLpzJD1eT6 bhB8RIPZseJyrmJCAlWu/UuRmI5dnz5ZWhN/4WH/tU6ZacYuYr5gj6q0z2TvKXp5REIB PqQb+9NlrWlVxW4ROLSGNWJeDOvGx1TcPRRFw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=fLLwPQjdEqB4I7qBQiXDtS8iZ4JUdo0YEyojceA9cCqrgPAnMyJYODL/834C8+jris jatNU96H4SNdRWVrpdWHH7TsZtArexnWAiEfrtdUZnRx2iWXrL4mr96a8Asq3ibcmz05 +tSv9XutkFA5/mblnTuQXQQCW0IH4Ie9J04bM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.1.129 with SMTP id 1mr1061186qcf.163.1286478057648; Thu, 07 Oct 2010 12:00:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.85.3 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Oct 2010 12:00:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <558537.71010.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201010070900.05461.phma@phma.optus.nu> <978607.64371.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 7 Oct 2010 15:00:57 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 12 From: Michael Turniansky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364ed198a332c004920b832e X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 3501 Lines: 72 --0016364ed198a332c004920b832e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Stela Selckiku wrote: > On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:11 AM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > > > > {natpa'i} already exists in jbovlaste:patriot; nationalist > > I would understand a {naijgi} to be a milder version of a {natpa'i}. > > I wouldn't think they would be mild vs strong, exactly. I'd think a > naijgi is someone who's proud of their nation, and a natpa'i is > someone who loves their nation. You might be naijgi without having > the depth of feeling to be natpa'i, so it could be milder in that > sense, but I'd think you could also be very natpa'i without being > naijgi, for instance if your nation which you deeply love is taking > actions about which you're ashamed. It seems to me they're both good > translations for "patriotic", depending on context, and it seems to me > a beautiful and useful distinction. > > mi'e .telselkik. mu'o > > I assume, in the context of the thread, that these were lujvo actually used in la .alis. but not in jbovlaste, so totus is working with what he's presented with, and discussion about whther or not these are the RIGHT words for a particular English concept (as opposed to the other way 'round) are outside the scope of this thread. --gejyspa --0016364ed198a332c004920b832e Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Stela Selckiku <= span dir=3D"ltr"><selckiku@gmail.c= om> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 7, 2010 at 9:11 AM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
>
>= ; {natpa'i} already exists in jbovlaste:patriot; nationalist
> I = would understand a {naijgi} to be a milder version of a {natpa'i}.

I wouldn't think they would be mild vs strong, exactly. =C2= =A0I'd think a
naijgi is someone who's proud of their nation, an= d a natpa'i is
someone who loves their nation. =C2=A0You might be na= ijgi without having
the depth of feeling to be natpa'i, so it could be milder in that
se= nse, but I'd think you could also be very natpa'i without being
= naijgi, for instance if your nation which you deeply love is taking
actions about which you're ashamed. =C2=A0It seems to me they're bo= th good
translations for "patriotic", depending on context, an= d it seems to me
a beautiful and useful distinction.

mi'e .te= lselkik. mu'o

=C2=A0 I assume, in the context of the thread, that these were lujvo a= ctually used in la .alis. but not in jbovlaste, so totus is working with wh= at he's presented with, and=C2=A0discussion about whther or not these a= re the RIGHT words for a particular English concept (as opposed to the othe= r way 'round) are outside the scope of this thread.
=C2=A0
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0= =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 --gejyspa
=C2=A0

--0016364ed198a332c004920b832e--