Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:50:42 -0700
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;  s=s1024; d=rogers.com;  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;  b=S79dc5DNDPUKjMsgFwqp+SdETVDCAXI1LrKSVVLQ0tmGnN6nU+nJbtnF1Jjo2yfdf7mkmd/+S2t/wtx4mlhGpD++avbNKtJhN9dyImllg4yHgFhcsjzHOxrjacKZ/36Uh+TI9MCXGlI1KPVRyI8Wc8tUWGyGZ30M0ckgsSKnL1E=;
Message-ID: <358035.75619.qm@web88005.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <591650.39541.qm@web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <AANLkTi=vxOkWgJ+o+=KEhLxbKhCFYOZg=wE2CnXxLGuh@mail.gmail.com> <904926.62018.qm@web88007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <AANLkTi=MZCxPQFQemZnrQ7J=Xfjfe+-cMKeV5axwvgYa@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 16:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 13
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=MZCxPQFQemZnrQ7J=Xfjfe+-cMKeV5axwvgYa@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Length: 805
Lines: 29


----- Original Message ----
> From: Jorge Llambías <jjllambias@gmail.com>
> To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
> Sent: Sun, October 10, 2010 2:48:43 PM
> Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland 13
> 
> On Sun, Oct 10, 2010 at 3:39 PM, A. PIEKARSKI <totus@rogers.com> wrote:
> >>
> > But isn't {danfu} already a solution i.e. a remedy?  Thats why I was trying 
>to
> > treat the {tadji} part as 'coming up iwth a remedy'.
> 
> "danfu" would normally work perfectly for "remedy", but read the
> context. The Dodo is using pointlessly obfuscating language to say
> basically nothing, that's the reason for the silly "daftadji". The
> next line is someone telling him "ko tavla bau la lojban".
> 
Ok.  But then there's no point in defining a lujvo for it in jbovlaste. 
This was a 'one time' lijvo.

totus