Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:49:48 -0700 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P7mKv-0000Wz-6M; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:48:57 -0700 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:47:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P7mJe-0000Ws-Ax for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:47:38 -0700 Received: from rekin26.go2.pl ([193.17.41.76]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P7mJY-0000WB-Id for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:47:38 -0700 Received: from rekin26.go2.pl (unknown [10.0.0.2]) by rekin26.go2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6CD35D7EF for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (unknown [10.0.0.74]) by rekin26.go2.pl (Postfix) with SMTP for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail-bw0-f53.google.com [209.85.214.53] by poczta.o2.pl with ESMTP id IxvpCb; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:11 +0200 Received: by bwz3 with SMTP id 3so1109941bwz.40 for ; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:47:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.62.193 with SMTP id y1mr1980172bkh.131.1287395229451; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:47:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.25.136 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 02:47:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 11:47:08 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Different definitions of {tamsmi} From: Janek To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-O2-Trust: 2, 68 X-O2-SPF: neutral X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: j-sz@o2.pl Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 567 Lines: 16 coi I found an inconsistence in jbovlaste: {tamsmi}, according to official definition, is "x1 has form x2, similar in form to x3 in property/quality x4". Although, in notes of {tai} we read "tamsmi is x1 resembles x2 sharing ideal form/shape x3 in property x4". Clearly, x2 and x3 switched places. This also affects the definition of {setai}: "tamsmi modal, 2nd place similarly; resembling ... (in ideal form).", where according to the official definition of {tamsmi} it should be "sharing ideal form ... (with something else)" or so. Am I right? mu'o mi'e ianek