Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:46:50 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PL5N5-0001Jd-JX; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:46:11 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:43:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PL5Ka-0001JK-1q for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:43:43 -0800 Received: from mail-gw0-f53.google.com ([74.125.83.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PL5KF-0001If-JH for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:43:35 -0800 Received: by gwb1 with SMTP id 1so14001926gwb.40 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:43:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received :in-reply-to:references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0+yPoyHCZ41kNsqHOCDOfnnT21yaHdvN3Jqphwvf0gI=; b=IxiI2Fx+JpmFPlcIgNzhzQu0fAjDPClMb1s8BDmO9HDQVmy0TdLQfEGWpaiqcNbkg9 7RGdJYtua7tYkJQqhKCSzqymwFJaUKNphom4ni9QmPK5FV/ffM4px05jUnmnwharJrlc 1nCWMq7JaczvsyGEQnfOodfFKnGF4//+4caBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=CieBveTQIwG8gRdI8OXfyrm/rqaXjjQuvFbFghOobS0iqg4pOTFTSFPdHPWXGLV4Av DTMlRcckKPpTErcdIKRArSj5zzvteZ9UR0vvAnKQIf6GOJt9XxMO6pI6Cna/WApaVkTw jUW0BFF1hBo/DuEPKPYk/pOA+J7z34zxcK8iA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.5.2 with SMTP id 2mr5637514ane.213.1290566586571; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:43:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.44.16 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Nov 2010 18:43:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <770898.27481.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20101123224830.GV8367@nvg.org> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 21:43:06 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Jm00lONnRdsWrKizzVtYdoDs8IE Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: fu'ivla for liquors From: Craig Daniel To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: teucer@pobox.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 829 Lines: 24 2010/11/23 Jorge Llambías : > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 8:03 PM, Craig Daniel wrote: >> On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Arnt Richard Johansen wrote: >>> >>> {uiski} is not a valid lujvo because *-ui- doesn't have rafsi form. So {uiski} is in fact a well-formed type 4 fu'ivla. >> >> The first sentence there is true, obviously. The fu'ivla appears to >> nonetheless fail a sort of backwards slinku'i test, in that ".uiski >> kabri" falls apart into ".ui skikabri," and "skikabri" is a valid >> lujvo. > > "uiski kabri" is not "ui skikabri" just like "daski kabri" is not "da skikabri". Um, yes. This. Looks like the major brain fart that set me driving exactly the wrong direction this evening was not the only one of its kind today. - mi'e .kreig.