Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:05:36 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLHqE-0006pB-DB; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:05:06 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:04:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLHpR-0006on-L1 for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:04:17 -0800 Received: from earth.ccil.org ([192.190.237.11]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLHpM-0006ls-3W for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 08:04:16 -0800 Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PLHpK-0006fy-SY for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:04:10 -0500 Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:04:10 -0500 From: John Cowan To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: fu'ivla for liquors Message-ID: <20101124160410.GC3576@mercury.ccil.org> References: <770898.27481.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201011232247.21133.phma@phma.optus.nu> <956656.46566.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20101124151934.GA12462@alice.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101124151934.GA12462@alice.local> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: cowan@mercury.ccil.org Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 682 Lines: 19 Alan Post scripsit: > I broadly agree that we should stick to the strict definitions. I'm > curious *why* the strict definitions refer to products from specific > areas of France, and whether that reason is sufficient to carry into > a fu'ivla. Because essentially they are trademarks in France; nothing is cognac that doesn't come from Cognac. Whether you think this is legitimate truth-in-labeling or mere restraint of trade is, of course, up to you. -- Even a refrigerator can conform to the XML John Cowan Infoset, as long as it has a door sticker cowan@ccil.org saying "No information items inside". http://www.ccil.org/~cowan --Eve Maler