Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:12:10 -0800
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;  s=s1024; d=rogers.com;  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding;  b=2IiPrTvNy7kjSAYiIoRI8wDvRLFFprvHthNWeGupjjy8JGE6Hasfbrm8JUyg6dcWqAIXZLEJaeHSlGZtsagyuh8tOjygkkTMQXPYHLtrNqvfXbGk8ejugbR00xz9duZitJa9DHVTIX48mc3k/X2cG6hvxN4B/jNLHF/91SMOj0Y=;
Message-ID: <29879.39617.qm@web88002.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
References: <770898.27481.qm@web88001.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201011232247.21133.phma@phma.optus.nu> <956656.46566.qm@web88003.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <20101124151934.GA12462@alice.local>
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2010 09:03:57 -0800 (PST)
From: "A. PIEKARSKI" <totus@rogers.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: fu'ivla for liquors
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
In-Reply-To: <20101124151934.GA12462@alice.local>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Length: 657
Lines: 25

> > > >
> > > > 1) koinka (cognac)
> > > 
> > 
> > Which brings up the issue of what exactly 'cognac' and 'champagne' mean.
> > Strictly speaking, cognacs and champagnes come from very specific areas in 
> > France.  If they don't, then they are brandies and sparkling wines.
> > 
> > However, in most countries, colloquially (wine) brandy and sparkling wine 
> > ARE referred to as 'cognac' and 'champagne'.  My view nonetheless is that we 

> > should stick to the strict definition, but I'm open to arguement.
> > 
> > Opinions?
> > 
> 
> I broadly agree that we should stick to the strict definitions.  


So {fonvanju} for 'sparkling wines'?

totus