Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:54:14 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLzfG-0006GK-4F; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:52:42 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:50:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLzdO-0006F2-JO for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:50:46 -0800 Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PLzdJ-00061d-H9 for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:50:46 -0800 Received: by qwe5 with SMTP id 5so2409477qwe.40 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=THqfDyYuxxVWufZRwoDA6ip+qcb1a9t7fOFZdGvWfOk=; b=jEFbprQIAQPdjkahGgn5VCIGnWn8RwYPUpDucf4v3YGOTpDh7qds3wwhAraQ8eeWIS LpWapGGm2pOlPuq90MJkieNEm18jVOwwSelhMhddZkwEhmN6aCXroQvxC+S9n9eOcoXg LzYAf7JBxoDYzK7v2urX1/KizSnNvfYHKQsw4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=IfItnrabmWD00wzwHp99C/7Dg1Mt555X/p/XMy8SxyhMU2lZBgDPoXgqDyU7AANHoz MlGRkyQ48nGPIAhBKBe5nJYdtPsAlTb2ZFLpMlNyPHJ8qkbu8rggdVZGX4C2ZnPhSIFG 3EuMNZJCZJ8+DkFA/vSO9rGKfypeJTQR7ttII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.204 with SMTP id cl12mr1824538qcb.228.1290783035520; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.219.14 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:50:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201011250037.05069.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201011250037.05069.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:50:35 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: kunkemgerplucpi From: Michael Turniansky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001485f773b050769d0495f5d8b1 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1465 Lines: 39 --001485f773b050769d0495f5d8b1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > Is this word OK, or can the "kem" be removed, or does it need a "pev" in > there > somewhere? I don't think it's OK to say "kunra gerplucpi" as it may not be > a > literal gerplucpi. > > I'm guessing, knowing my etymology, that a gerplucpi is a canary. But what the heck is a mineral canary? --gejyspa --001485f773b050769d0495f5d8b1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 12:37 AM, Pierre Abbat <= span dir=3D"ltr"><phma@phma.optus.= nu> wrote:
Is this word OK, or can the &quo= t;kem" be removed, or does it need a "pev" in there
somew= here? I don't think it's OK to say "kunra gerplucpi" as i= t may not be a
literal gerplucpi.

=C2=A0 I'm guessing, knowing my etymology, that a gerplucpi is a c= anary.=C2=A0 But what the heck is a mineral canary?
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2= =A0=C2=A0 --gejyspa
=C2=A0
--001485f773b050769d0495f5d8b1--