Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:43:31 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PT1vj-0004L8-Rw; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:42:47 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:41:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PT1ui-0004L2-Ab for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:41:44 -0800 Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PT1ue-0004Kl-Og for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:41:44 -0800 Received: by qwe5 with SMTP id 5so2863308qwe.40 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:41:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qPzexzSBDmGxv9G8XadQmpHye2ItJm82xbZntrJLX74=; b=VE/hJOc58CEMlXNnYNs278aoFD2IkeW9+ywPuJbjR+avxEeEeI0ovTJ+78XDrbo0eB oXSKKSRQDOIDWsFsbYGGfPqzfcQu0kE5Td7s8PMEPcfC1tgEyu28UeR/PLKosi9ptS7W U5gVcRfmQQWsjeOrFJyHLPyrDZmk5oXH5HOqY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ohxE9xnpHxeg6bST8VhMSDwXf0WvoAYoYNmj7c5cDq52Hyn4fXA5BhQEOAZuGTTnrk jldcItKe0EgWp+pegm4qVRc0pAyt2gqwjUGUgY7ZDLYfrWnp9HTQlsBlXF+M/w5FxVfr puwNu9KP5s6m889JlQdA3PAFhqrXvxahesX4s= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.186.75 with SMTP id cr11mr1086981qcb.113.1292460094810; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:41:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.212.1 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:41:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <821066.98318.qm@web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> References: <143260.7676.qm@web88005.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <201012141326.05329.phma@phma.optus.nu> <758400.4191.qm@web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> <821066.98318.qm@web88008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:41:34 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: Alice in Wonderland nix From: Michael Turniansky To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by Ecartis X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: mturniansky@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 1281 Lines: 61 I have no problem with syllabic "L", so don't mind "nanl". --gejyspa On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 2:18 PM, A. PIEKARSKI wrote: > >>I see. >>I still think {nax} is a confusing choice given its rafsi association. >>I think, given the lack of a short rafsi for {nanla} we could resort to: >>{nanlal}. > > If we use {naun} for 'Mr.' then we can use {naux} for > Master.  Symmetry preserved! > > totus > >>> >>>> >>>> > So I propose also these rafsi-based cmevle: >>>> > >>>> > {nim} for Ms. >>> >>>> > Since no rafsi are available for Mr. and Master, >>>> > I propose: >>>> > >>>> > {nax} for Master >>>> > {nan} for Mr. >>> >>> >>>How about {naur}? What's {nax} from, besides the >>>> North Caucasus? >>>> >>> >>>The reason I chose {nax} and {nan} was to provide some >>>symmetry - although I don't feel that strongly about it. >>> >>>.nix. (Miss) >>>.nax. (Master) >>>.nan. (Mister) >>>.nim.(Ms) >>>Aviv, the meaning of 'Master' here is the male counterpart of 'Miss'. >>>Not much used in English these days, but it is used in other >>>languages. >>> >>>Using short rafsi as a base was a fine idea, but we can't stick to it >>>too religiously.  {nanla} doesn't have a short rafsi, so {nax} was an >>>obvious choice. >>> >>>totus >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > > >