Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:04:44 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTav4-0004jQ-8O; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:04:26 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:03:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTauX-0004jK-Dl for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:03:53 -0800 Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTauS-0004j4-5H for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:03:53 -0800 Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so623979fxm.11 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:03:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=hblM+mWyhCY0o3nFUbEECpyQq8HqBaSASw3mW5eMJwU=; b=kGhXSgTwksVt13TM8plLuCzMDEriRIjafXyF8WjEZVrzxZUZRQ6wI+YwVzP3ck7vEV Ee8oSuydLQH1Je3heK2VE3BLqBoGdxGLqcA4msohtQ+V/Dw3LGzpXoSWIj6L6ixnsD37 zEFU72wnrTz9liUgCTmTbutfwBccAeGJKC2hc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=e4aAG1jhSUApRNn76Jknra2yeM0+4QZZPYAStpX5m6/uVNw+XBijr9JY/cFwsGzkVX s73DaI2M0aq3i+sWEq679YuNBrvfhL0+MIBMBaZhDBfXRwtDRytIoBpX0ObIHoAbGZxr lb8JbU6rG3Ot085T5XiuI4DJsT4tY7ou0zhGo= Received: by 10.223.96.68 with SMTP id g4mr1158392fan.33.1292594621859; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:03:41 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.66.220 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:03:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101217133000.GA32499@alice.local> References: <20101217133000.GA32499@alice.local> From: Oren Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:03:21 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: defining "debug" To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf30433eda46476804979ba302 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: get.oren@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 3996 Lines: 125 --20cf30433eda46476804979ba302 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 For reference, the Chinese word for debug is tiao-shi, a compound that broken apart means "tweak/alter" + "try" -- change it, try it, change it, try it. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:30, .alyn.post. wrote: > I'm working on a lujvo for "debug," as in "locate and correct errors > in computer program code." > > I've got: > > cfila : c1 (property - ka) is a flaw/fault/defect in c2 causing c3. > sisku : s1 seeks/searches/looks for property s2 among set s3. > > which creates the lujvo cfisisku, which one could define: > > s1 debugs computer program c2 for flaw/property c1==s2 causing c3 > > To me, the sumti places map extremely well, I'm very pleased to see > it that way. I'm concerned about defining the x2 places as needing > to be a computer program, as that doesn't follow at all from the > gismu that make up this word. > > I could add skami as part of the Lujvo: > > samcfisisku > > But now I have two words to define, and I'm not sure what gloss > words I would use to define cfisisku. Is it wise to add the sam > rafsi? > > I'd also like to add a Lojban definition for this lujvo. I'm > uncertain as to how to do this, and would appreciate help improving > what I've got: > > ko'a sisku lo ka cfila goi ko'e lo samselpla goi ko'i > > I've missed specifying the c3 place, and I haven't linked any of the > xN places to xN places in the gismu definitions. Will you point me > in the right direction? > > -Alan > -- > .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi > > > > -- Oren Robinson (315) 569-2888 102 Morrison Ave Somerville, MA 02144 --20cf30433eda46476804979ba302 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
For reference, the Chinese word for debug is tiao-shi, a c= ompound that broken apart means "tweak/alter" + "try" -= - change it, try it, change it, try it.

O= n Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:30, .alyn.post. <alyn.post@lodockikumazvati.org&g= t; wrote:
I'm working on a lujvo for "debug,= " as in "locate and correct errors
in computer program code."

I've got:

cfila : c1 (property - ka) is a flaw/fault/defect in c2 causing c3.
sisku : s1 seeks/searches/looks for property s2 among set s3.

which creates the lujvo cfisisku, which one could define:

s1 debugs computer program c2 for flaw/property c1=3D=3Ds2 causing c3

To me, the sumti places map extremely well, I'm very pleased to see
it that way. =A0I'm concerned about defining the x2 places as needing to be a computer program, as that doesn't follow at all from the
gismu that make up this word.

I could add skami as part of the Lujvo:

=A0samcfisisku

But now I have two words to define, and I'm not sure what gloss
words I would use to define cfisisku. =A0Is it wise to add the sam
rafsi?

I'd also like to add a Lojban definition for this lujvo. =A0I'm
uncertain as to how to do this, and would appreciate help improving
what I've got:

=A0ko'a sisku lo ka cfila goi ko'e lo samselpla goi ko'i

I've missed specifying the c3 place, and I haven't linked any of th= e
xN places to xN places in the gismu definitions. =A0Will you point me
in the right direction?

-Alan
--
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi






--
Oren Robinson
(315) 569-2888
102 Morrison Ave
Some= rville, MA 02144

--20cf30433eda46476804979ba302--