Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,SPF_PASS,T_DKIM_INVALID, T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:06:09 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTawV-0004qL-CN; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:05:55 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:05:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTawA-0004qF-5N for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:05:34 -0800 Received: from mail-iy0-f181.google.com ([209.85.210.181]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTaw5-0004pf-MM for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:05:34 -0800 Received: by iyj18 with SMTP id 18so605529iyj.40 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:05:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Yex6Wj2kRDfyisifGxFDFiZsSxSFe1Pp3ELQqf2badI=; b=atbnEJ839XO1xyZbW98PttCkPxlej+AqrTx0KS4IfC1VGNsomHaZRXULj9yjYeBdrq ZHPL5Gg7T5xp6bHlc1TylEpGlrzDAqnErCO2DdaXZcjNQlUtOCeCmWcucg527nq56ftV HbjYJEwc2d3JR2ePgarTmidcZTIPsW2L5tQMo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=Hqix/OuF7NuNBOZGuQPrISI9YVOjYOKcR+2EyIaiOjsULUuDcXkBEHALmPMlY0RMeC EnsMxkVnDDQYyqUmhxyM8y6QEn2kE3p2+ErtQX9A27Yf+KChFUdcjhufbZvVKPJrd0GY 5mS5vABj+Gt7r5L4c7jYiJXh3pB7QhwoLDjbM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.207.84 with SMTP id fx20mr800045ibb.62.1292594723137; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:05:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.19.199 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:05:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101217133000.GA32499@alice.local> References: <20101217133000.GA32499@alice.local> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:05:23 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: defining "debug" From: Luke Bergen To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba4fc5144fab9604979ba99d X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: lukeabergen@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 3690 Lines: 112 --90e6ba4fc5144fab9604979ba99d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 I would highly recommend adding the {sam} rafsi. If I saw cfisisku the first thing that would come to mind is "proof reader" ;) On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, .alyn.post. wrote: > I'm working on a lujvo for "debug," as in "locate and correct errors > in computer program code." > > I've got: > > cfila : c1 (property - ka) is a flaw/fault/defect in c2 causing c3. > sisku : s1 seeks/searches/looks for property s2 among set s3. > > which creates the lujvo cfisisku, which one could define: > > s1 debugs computer program c2 for flaw/property c1==s2 causing c3 > > To me, the sumti places map extremely well, I'm very pleased to see > it that way. I'm concerned about defining the x2 places as needing > to be a computer program, as that doesn't follow at all from the > gismu that make up this word. > > I could add skami as part of the Lujvo: > > samcfisisku > > But now I have two words to define, and I'm not sure what gloss > words I would use to define cfisisku. Is it wise to add the sam > rafsi? > > I'd also like to add a Lojban definition for this lujvo. I'm > uncertain as to how to do this, and would appreciate help improving > what I've got: > > ko'a sisku lo ka cfila goi ko'e lo samselpla goi ko'i > > I've missed specifying the c3 place, and I haven't linked any of the > xN places to xN places in the gismu definitions. Will you point me > in the right direction? > > -Alan > -- > .i ko djuno fi le do sevzi > > > > --90e6ba4fc5144fab9604979ba99d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I would highly recommend adding the {sam} rafsi. =A0If I saw cfisisku the f= irst thing that would come to mind is "proof reader" ;)

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:30 AM, .alyn.post. <alyn.pos= t@lodockikumazvati.org> wrote:
I'm working on a lujvo for "debug,= " as in "locate and correct errors
in computer program code."

I've got:

cfila : c1 (property - ka) is a flaw/fault/defect in c2 causing c3.
sisku : s1 seeks/searches/looks for property s2 among set s3.

which creates the lujvo cfisisku, which one could define:

s1 debugs computer program c2 for flaw/property c1=3D=3Ds2 causing c3

To me, the sumti places map extremely well, I'm very pleased to see
it that way. =A0I'm concerned about defining the x2 places as needing to be a computer program, as that doesn't follow at all from the
gismu that make up this word.

I could add skami as part of the Lujvo:

=A0samcfisisku

But now I have two words to define, and I'm not sure what gloss
words I would use to define cfisisku. =A0Is it wise to add the sam
rafsi?

I'd also like to add a Lojban definition for this lujvo. =A0I'm
uncertain as to how to do this, and would appreciate help improving
what I've got:

=A0ko'a sisku lo ka cfila goi ko'e lo samselpla goi ko'i

I've missed specifying the c3 place, and I haven't linked any of th= e
xN places to xN places in the gismu definitions. =A0Will you point me
in the right direction?

-Alan
--
.i ko djuno fi le do sevzi




--90e6ba4fc5144fab9604979ba99d--