Return-path: <jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	chain.digitalkingdom.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,
	DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,
	T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on
	chain.digitalkingdom.org
Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org
Delivery-date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:16:24 -0800
Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127])
	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org>)
	id 1PTeqC-0000wP-S3; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:15:41 -0800
Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:14:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72)	(envelope-from <nobody@digitalkingdom.org>)	id 1PTep6-0000wJ-L0	for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:14:32 -0800
Received: from mail-fx0-f52.google.com ([209.85.161.52])	by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)	(envelope-from <get.oren@gmail.com>)	id 1PTep3-0000w0-Dv	for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:14:32 -0800
Received: by fxm5 with SMTP id 5so879662fxm.11        for <jbovlaste@lojban.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:14:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date         :message-id:subject:to:content-type;        bh=LYKOfmW3zIryRVPuv4xA8nr3nu0oTLhSe6bO5akmt50=;        b=PbJiET5xkJ9A0RjI+JH+JPf9ved2C31W00Wr7+qXT6iu2UBxA4Zmk0KmdipRyk2xOZ         eu1+ZmVrFRrGDQi26pPSSzzawy2EaUCQfJZnM1ZUxIfDIoC5kyV4bS1AOl4x/JXVA0ud         zotl0r8eqKF1YGNqIZk5jaNmbFeCnfLwI6ecE=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;        h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type;        b=Gft7CKmRN8BgFHrZx04ud1cR3jqQUEG0V+NnKap8dUm0cluxbOFOwqZ/8GL8IBMUL+         ujtJZr6a8Iegpa/T0+ZoUKFFFpJkiwciOW/3vH2XgIU5d1raHVj8NROBAArXTVxeHJjq         1Dfyadv+REp/APu2B9tJ10J8IXO5kh2G1JOO0=
Received: by 10.223.112.1 with SMTP id u1mr1401871fap.109.1292609663008; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:14:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.66.220 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:14:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Oren <get.oren@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:14:02 -0500
Message-ID: <AANLkTimxenMX6xbVEUbD4F61ubaJHVg-8QL2yOFCBbTe@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: [jbovlaste] Debug: is {troci} right?
To: jbovlaste@lojban.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636c5a4e5cbff8904979f239a
X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org
X-original-sender: get.oren@gmail.com
Precedence: bulk
Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org
X-list: jbovlaste
Content-Length: 2314
Lines: 62

--001636c5a4e5cbff8904979f239a
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 when I { troci }, i think of it as an effort/attempt at something, whereas
when i think of "trying something out" i.e. giving a car a test drive, or
running a program to see some output, i see that as something more like {
cipra } or pajni or jarco, I'm verifying some parameter that's in question,

ex.
{ mi troci lonu sazri lo karce }
I'm trying to drive a car, as in
I'm attempting/making an effort to attain driving a car.

{ mi cipra lo spofu lo karce } ?
I'm trying out the car, as in
I'm taking a car for a test drive to see if/how it's broken.

(I probably said those wrong)

So maybe troci isn't the right thing to integrate into "debugging"? How
about { cipra cikre } for test-fix?

-- 
Oren Robinson
(315) 569-2888
102 Morrison Ave
Somerville, MA 02144

--001636c5a4e5cbff8904979f239a
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<div dir=3D"ltr"><meta http-equiv=3D"content-type" content=3D"text/html; ch=
arset=3Dutf-8"><span class=3D"Apple-style-span" style=3D"font-family: arial=
, sans-serif; font-size: 11px; border-collapse: collapse; color: rgb(51, 51=
, 51); "><div>

when I { troci }, i think of it as an effort/attempt at something, whereas =
when i think of &quot;trying something out&quot; i.e. giving a car a test d=
rive, or running a program to see some output, i see that as something more=
 like { cipra } or pajni or jarco, I&#39;m verifying some parameter that&#3=
9;s in question,</div>

<div><br></div><div>ex.</div><div>{ mi troci lonu sazri lo karce }<br>I&#39=
;m trying to drive a car, as in</div><div>I&#39;m attempting/making an effo=
rt to attain driving a car.</div><div><br></div><div>{ mi cipra lo spofu lo=
 karce } ?</div>

<div>I&#39;m trying out the car, as in</div><div>I&#39;m taking a car for a=
 test drive to see if/how it&#39;s broken.</div><div><br></div><div>(I prob=
ably said those wrong)</div><div><br></div><div>So maybe troci isn&#39;t th=
e right thing to integrate into &quot;debugging&quot;? How about { cipra ci=
kre } for test-fix?</div>

</span><br>-- <br><div dir=3D"ltr">Oren Robinson<div>(315) 569-2888</div><d=
iv>102 Morrison Ave</div><div>Somerville, MA 02144</div></div><br>
</div>

--001636c5a4e5cbff8904979f239a--