Return-path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Personal-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on chain.digitalkingdom.org Envelope-to: rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org Delivery-date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:39:45 -0800 Received: from chain.digitalkingdom.org ([192.168.123.127]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PeWZI-0003y5-Gj; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:39:08 -0800 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list jbovlaste); Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:38:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from nobody by chain.digitalkingdom.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PeWYN-0003xz-Mt for jbovlaste-real@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:38:11 -0800 Received: from mail-qw0-f53.google.com ([209.85.216.53]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PeWYF-0003xo-GD for jbovlaste@lojban.org; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:38:11 -0800 Received: by qwe5 with SMTP id 5so5012466qwe.40 for ; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:37:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Og7A+E+M+EhbQB8pKUjRAlfRO+3vJy3o5sKFf0rDGlA=; b=KvHLo03pJuTqXuzAukygvO7kmM4FDYvfR2sDdzdfpWdBClCUcts2tXGoCAm3Aw0yxF lJKigAXA9g5xtqwTFrnDkZfro6qDTowKU/vKYVUxyAH2YNAXGVbSJqPgLyTdz4wQ7hgg Moy7HYAV3eQw0r8TKB7o8MqlWpkQhzHfHkC2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=W5MTYew74OWW0Y7ehVYOCFwWiSoOs2P7B9Zsvp45sT56onRcjxaJ4kzyrNKh9d+VpK 6h4GnWSV0Xmg1XuS74aPxQUpLgrLv/g9RnFSKyNFtgXiOsQ8uXmT6FTcRJCQfouYFguK D4KmPka/1ghyyOE05inzJe995owtUmjYbudJo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.91.3 with SMTP id k3mr2793921qcm.84.1295199477350; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:37:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.63.34 with HTTP; Sun, 16 Jan 2011 09:37:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201101161139.36413.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201101161139.36413.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2011 19:37:57 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: [jbovlaste] Re: syndrome From: "Aviv S." To: jbovlaste@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001636426c61c2c34a0499fa20c6 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org Errors-to: jbovlaste-bounce@lojban.org X-original-sender: seraviv@gmail.com Precedence: bulk Reply-to: jbovlaste@lojban.org X-list: jbovlaste Content-Length: 7646 Lines: 138 --001636426c61c2c34a0499fa20c6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Well, the definition of Syndrome is: "A group of symptoms that together are characteristic of a specific disorder, disease, or the like." Now, bilma2 is already symptom*s*, so it should be {broda selbi'a}. I would use {kampu} to show that they all have in common the fact that they are specific to a single disease. Resulting in {kauselbi'a} However, it is best to stick with the original form without inversions in the main definition, so we get: {ko'a kaubi'a ko'e ko'i .ijo ko'a bilma ko'e poi se kampu loka srana ko'i ku'o ko'i} or: "x1 exhibits syndrome x2 of disease x3" On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > What's a good word for "syndrome"? I've been thinking "selbilmo'a", but I'm > not sure that's the best word. > > Pierre > -- > lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko > > > > --001636426c61c2c34a0499fa20c6 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Well, the definition of Syndrome is:
"A group of symptoms that together are characteristic of a specific disorder, disease, or the like."
Now, bil= ma2 is already symptom*s*, so it should be {broda selbi'a}.
I would = use {kampu} to show that they all have in common the fact that they are spe= cific to a single disease.
Resulting in {kauselbi'a}
=A0
However, it is best to stick with the original form without inversions= in the main definition, so we get:
{ko'a kaubi'a ko'e ko'i=A0.ijo ko'a bilma ko'e= poi se kampu loka srana ko'i ku'o ko'i}
or: "x1=A0exhibits syndrome x2 of disease x3"
=A0


=A0
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 6:39 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.n= u> wrote:
What's a good word for "= ;syndrome"? I've been thinking "selbilmo'a", but I&#= 39;m
not sure that's the best word.

Pierre
--
lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko



--001636426c61c2c34a0499fa20c6--