Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of jjllambias@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.174 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.210.174;
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <201110171319.16802.phma@phma.optus.nu>
References: <201106122219.25705.phma@phma.optus.nu>
	<201110171319.16802.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 20:01:02 -0300
Message-ID: <CAO7tK2ckQiGnnGzW7=ZS4ARTUE2F11np3LaeCKdqBJsfZBRUhg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: rating scales
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jorge_Llamb=EDas?= <jjllambias@gmail.com>
To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
Reply-To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu> wrote:
> Here's a suggestion for a cmavo scale:
> 0: LE, CU, LA, COI, DOI, PA, BU, BY, KOhA, I, UI, GOI, DOhU, GOhA, NA, PU, Y
> 1: A, BAI, BAhE, BE, BEI, BEhO, CAhA, FA, SE, CAI, GEhU, NU, KEI, LAhE, MOI,
> NAI, ROI, SI, VA, ZI, LUhU
> 2: GA, GI, GIhA, GUhA, JA, JOI, BIhI, KE, KEhE, NOI, KUhO, LU, LIhU, LI, ME,
> NAhE, TAhE, VAU, VEhA, ZEhA, VIhA, ZIhA, ZAhO, FAhA, ZO, BO, BOI, CO
> 3: JAI, GAhO, LOhU, LEhU, NIhO, RAhO, TO, TOI, ZEI, ZOhU, CUhE, KI, FEhE,
> DAhO, LOhO, MEhU, MOhI
> 4: MAI, SA, SU, SEI, SOI, SEhU, TUhE, TUhU, CEI, FIhO, FEhU, FUhE, FUhO, VUhU,
> VUhO, XI, ZIhE
> 5: BIhE, CEhE, TEI, FOI, FUhA, KUhE, LAU, MAhO, MOhE, NAhU, NIhE, NUhA, NUhI,
> NUhU, PEhO, PEhE, TEhU, VEI, VEhO
>
> To apply the scale to a question, find the highest number corresponding to a
> selma'o of a cmavo in the question and answers (and accompanying text, if
> it's a reading comprehension question).

Sounds good. For my taste I would make some minor adjustments: move
GOI-GEhU, A, LAhE-LUhU, RAhO, DAhO down, and JOI, NOI-KUhO, ME-MEhU,
NAhE up, for example.

Also, in some cases I would move specific members of a selma'o up.

mu'o mi'e xorxes