Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=69.132.101.103;
From: Pierre Abbat <phma@phma.optus.nu>
To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
Subject: Should we keep track of people who pass the test?
Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 22:14:28 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <201208062214.29953.phma@phma.optus.nu>
Reply-To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
Precedence: list
Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owners@googlegroups.com
Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Spam_score: -0.7
X-Spam_score_int: -6
X-Spam_bar: /

Right now the database schema has one table with people's names in it: cipfihi 
holds the names of people who invent or review questions. I think that we 
should keep track of people who achieve a level of proficiency, and I see no 
reason why we can't put both sets of people in the same table. Do you agree? 
What should be the columns of the table?

Pierre
-- 
The Black Garden on the Mountain is not on the Black Mountain.