Received: from mail-gh0-f189.google.com ([209.85.160.189]:47882) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1SyaNn-0007TP-3J for lbck-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:23:09 -0700 Received: by ghbf16 with SMTP id f16sf4673809ghb.16 for ; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:22:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references :in-reply-to:mime-version:message-id:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive:sender :list-unsubscribe:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=hygj8YaXxJRRYgYk7oE9Q4cX1FWt7gM4M85dDFF2jMQ=; b=mQQz5RRe/6uXCXqOE2jrdWzApE6zZKHl0sNCSBYcuuyyuX5w5lUHY1QW8ROcXKRRr1 GHIVYr59B5EXInCJXEDX2idWflTi9EVD1a91tZimbDHnfsoP7Y5NCXhsTMgSMtDxc3C1 W/Z+gKvSbAuLIQeX5Sfp2c0f5Wvwj0cxuSp8U= Received: by 10.236.142.211 with SMTP id i59mr953944yhj.1.1344309772603; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:22:52 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.236.126.33 with SMTP id a21ls45594yhi.3.gmail; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.177.72 with SMTP id c48mr7050365yhm.31.1344309772293; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.177.72 with SMTP id c48mr7050363yhm.31.1344309772283; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chausie (cpe-069-132-101-103.carolina.res.rr.com. [69.132.101.103]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id u67si4838281yhi.7.2012.08.06.20.22.52; Mon, 06 Aug 2012 20:22:52 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: neutral (google.com: 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) client-ip=69.132.101.103; Received: from ip6-localhost (ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1]) by chausie (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD101217DD for ; Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:22:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Pierre Abbat To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: Should we keep track of people who pass the test? Date: Mon, 6 Aug 2012 23:22:49 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.6 (enterprise 0.20070907.709405) References: <201208062214.29953.phma@phma.optus.nu> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201208062322.50346.phma@phma.optus.nu> X-Original-Sender: phma@phma.optus.nu X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=neutral (google.com: 69.132.101.103 is neither permitted nor denied by best guess record for domain of phma@phma.optus.nu) smtp.mail=phma@phma.optus.nu Reply-To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 186919887485 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Score: -0.7 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.7 X-Spam_score_int: -6 X-Spam_bar: / On Monday 06 August 2012 22:16:53 Jonathan Jones wrote: > "Real name / Lojban name / tests attempted / tests passed / proficiency > level"? "tests attempted" and "tests passed" should be in a different table. It is possible to put arrays in a table column, but I don't know how to use them or how portable it is. Do we really need "tests attempted"? I don't see the need to enter someone who's never passed a test or authored a question. Here's that part of the database schema with your fields added (I changed the table name from "cipfihi" to "prenu": create table prenu (nacycme serial primary key, cipfihi boolean, plicme text, sivyvla text, rarbaucme text, jbocme text, nilcertu short ); create table ciptoi (tercipra int references prenu, detri date, nilnandu short, snada boolean ); > Also, where is this test? We're still designing it. Pierre -- lo ponse be lo mruli po'o cu ga'ezga roda lo ka dinko