From lojban-lbck+bncCOib25n_BhCh_LPvBBoEEluvyg@googlegroups.com Mon Jun 06 09:19:56 2011 Received: from mail-fx0-f61.google.com ([209.85.161.61]) by chain.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1QTcWt-0002fm-Hy for lbck-archive@lojban.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:55 -0700 Received: by fxm14 with SMTP id 14sf7072238fxm.16 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :x-original-sender:x-original-authentication-results:reply-to :precedence:mailing-list:list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post :list-help:list-archive:list-unsubscribe:content-type; bh=DuLtzv9PGKcL+vYVtmN31RTphm2DWwcIX2rYttgHd0o=; b=oAm/0UcYrlUJzNysLmwsQHOTX1v7PjAempsXx69NWM5FCFGuiIuyorGefLR/Gcod6h qAuXa2E/GQ1ZPlQTSkqjwQxh7UUmvACj77IRNDtfL7EleShcD6JxqvXYhYMTojCiwdNB x27iVj3S1Zpm/74UXRlT+Y1eVzzMYmyo81dxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlegroups.com; s=beta; h=x-beenthere:received-spf:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:x-original-sender :x-original-authentication-results:reply-to:precedence:mailing-list :list-id:x-google-group-id:list-post:list-help:list-archive :list-unsubscribe:content-type; b=MkR+irSs5XHQ2tGJaXZu+giBIttUYYQ906+nBQYgIJmGxRvlMESHj2F47ZrzqNUZhD Fs8usMP5Wz8JEdrYwnTAm/nYCt9glXoVkOqFiG3qtov4i7zgBtIf+q3KE+rwhcLExDDX 5FGn31rAOQx5viH+zaxkngjf5rMTSxF2S/aMU= Received: by 10.223.81.195 with SMTP id y3mr1003593fak.43.1307377185328; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:45 -0700 (PDT) X-BeenThere: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.16.207 with SMTP id p15ls1842557bka.3.gmail; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.86 with SMTP id o22mr587075bko.18.1307377184002; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.10.86 with SMTP id o22mr587074bko.18.1307377183947; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-bw0-f52.google.com (mail-bw0-f52.google.com [209.85.214.52]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l1si2762544bkl.1.2011.06.06.09.19.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Received-SPF: pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) client-ip=209.85.214.52; Received: by mail-bw0-f52.google.com with SMTP id 24so6340810bwj.39 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.24.4 with SMTP id t4mr5319747bkb.109.1307377183722; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) Sender: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Received: by 10.204.124.7 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 09:19:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201106052318.27859.phma@phma.optus.nu> References: <201106051950.22790.phma@phma.optus.nu> <201106052318.27859.phma@phma.optus.nu> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 12:19:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: some questions From: ".arpis." To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com X-Original-Sender: rpglover64@gmail.com X-Original-Authentication-Results: gmr-mx.google.com; spf=pass (google.com: domain of rpglover64@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) smtp.mail=rpglover64@gmail.com; dkim=pass (test mode) header.i=@gmail.com Reply-To: lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com Precedence: list Mailing-list: list lojban-lbck@googlegroups.com; contact lojban-lbck+owners@googlegroups.com List-ID: X-Google-Group-Id: 186919887485 List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0003255593be9f8ee404a50d78a0 --0003255593be9f8ee404a50d78a0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Pierre Abbat wrote: > On Sunday 05 June 2011 22:54:18 .arpis. wrote: > > Grammar question. I can't guess whether or not it would be easier for > > someone Japanese, but I eliminated 3 of the 5 choices by the fact that > they > > clearly don't fit, and looked up bo'u to check that it wasn't some > > important cmavo I didn't know. > > Would it be fair to include a cmavo, such as "be", which produces a > grammatical, but nonsensical, sentence? > Yes; I think it would be a good idea. > > Can you come up with some questions for the rest of us to try? > I'm not really sure what to ask... Is there a resource these questions are expected to be based on? > > Pierre > -- > I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wales. > -- mu'o mi'e .arpis. --0003255593be9f8ee404a50d78a0 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 11:18 PM, Pierre = Abbat <phma@phma= .optus.nu> wrote:
On Sunday 05 June 2011 22:54:18 .arpis. wrote:
> Grammar question. I can't guess whether or not it would be easier = for
> someone Japanese, but I eliminated 3 of the 5 choices by the fact that= they
> clearly don't fit, and looked up bo'u to check that it wasn= 9;t some
> important cmavo I didn't know.

Would it be fair to include a cmavo, such as "be", which pr= oduces a
grammatical, but nonsensical, sentence?

Yes; I thi= nk it would be a good idea.

Can you come up with some questions for the rest of us to try?

I'm not really sure what to ask... Is there a resource the= se questions are expected to be based on?

Pierre
--
I believe in Yellow when I'm in Sweden and in Black when I'm in Wal= es.



--
mu'o mi'= e .arpis.

--0003255593be9f8ee404a50d78a0--