Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 14:46:56 -0700
From: Robin Lee Powell <rlpowell@digitalkingdom.org>
To: llg-board@lojban.org
Message-ID: <20120701214656.GZ392@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
Mail-Followup-To: llg-board@lojban.org
References: <CABo9M2xj4mrJWCgbBr1=p3ab5eoAiRM8-rBsEyYmdC+GfzbLxg@mail.gmail.com>
 <4FEA2469.1040201@lojban.org>
 <20120626215146.GN392@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <4FEACD84.7040708@wakelift.de>
 <20120627210914.GA392@stodi.digitalkingdom.org>
 <4FEC888B.6050402@lojban.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4FEC888B.6050402@lojban.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Subject: Re: [llg-board] Creating a Dictionary
Precedence: list
Reply-To: llg-board@lojban.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: llg-board-bounces@lojban.org

On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:38:35PM -0400, Robert LeChevalier wrote:
> Robin Lee Powell wrote:
> >His request was to be paid the $960 up front, and then to work
> >the amount of time he specificed, or perhaps a bit more, with the
> >intent of finishing the job.
> >
> >Given the whole planning fallacy thing, I've requested that he
> >tie things more tightly to actual hours work; if we give him $800
> >(seemed a nice round number to start with), he will work 100
> >hours on this project and get back to us when that's done.
> 
> If Arnt accepts this as a friendly amendment, then I will support
> it.
> 
> Then, if there is no objection within 72 hours from my message
> being posted, Robin can consider the motion passed for dealing
> with the alacrity thing (assuming that is sufficient alacrity).

OK, calling it good.  Giving $800 to lindar (through me, because the
LLG's paypal adds 3-5 days).

-Robin

_______________________________________________
llg-board mailing list
llg-board@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board