Received: from localhost ([::1]:55738 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiOWx-0007sP-S1; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 08:15:23 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo102.cox.net ([68.230.241.214]:53690) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZiOWS-0007rx-OJ for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 08:15:21 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo209 ([68.230.241.224]) by eastrmfepo102.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20151003151446.ZLVS27841.eastrmfepo102.cox.net@eastrmimpo209> for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2015 11:14:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.242.63]) by eastrmimpo209 with cox id QfEm1r00M1Nn1eG01fEm6q; Sat, 03 Oct 2015 11:14:46 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020205.560FF0E6.00FF,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=VIYDaazX c=1 sm=1 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=1SUwKgTJAAAA:8 a=_jP1vRANzvpPSSy5JfAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=MjcZEyFwpaDLJ7si:21 a=UPrBnsu4J7di-IDX:21 a=sOxKrxY1QYXBcFVBIkZEyQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <55F8422C.7060108@lojban.org> From: Bob LeChevalier Message-ID: <560FF0F8.5030208@lojban.org> Date: Sat, 3 Oct 2015 11:15:04 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_bar: - Subject: Re: [llg-board] Time for another annual meeting? X-BeenThere: llg-board@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-board@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-board-bounces@lojban.org On 10/3/2015 3:12 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > One more important addition to the list of discussed issues. > > It's been one year since we last discussed a new hosting. I don't remember any prior discussion of this. Certainly not at the annual meeting. > For the last year the number of timedowns of lojban.org > was immense. I haven't seen mention of this on the lists until the most recent one. (And I think you mean "downtimes" - that may be the first time I've seen you make an English error in all your hundreds of postings %^) > Now a person from Australia is telling (in the main list) that the > lojban.org website is unaccessible 10% of time for > him so people quickly lose interest in Lojban. I think we would need more solid data than one person's subjective estimate. I doubt that I've seen the site down at all. > Hence I **demand** finally finding and trying a new hosting. > http://elasticweb.org/, for example, offers paying for actually used > resources, there isn't a fixed price. > Thus we can estimate how much we'll have to pay. We can discuss it, but I will have to say that I would oppose it right now, for a variety of reasons (some of which are probably due to my own ignorance). I could possibly accept having a mirror site, but I have no idea how such things work. Much less the cost. > Earlier la banseljaj was ready to help with deploying the website on a > new hosting, not sure about now. > But I'm sure we have enough people that are able to deploy mw.lojban.org > at a new location. lojbab _______________________________________________ llg-board mailing list llg-board@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board