Received: from localhost ([::1]:34115 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMex-0001yo-Vy; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:27:40 -0700 Received: from eastrmfepo203.cox.net ([68.230.241.218]:53037) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.85) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMer-0001yg-5x for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 00:27:38 -0700 Received: from eastrmimpo305 ([68.230.241.237]) by eastrmfepo203.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.05.15 201-2260-151-145-20131218) with ESMTP id <20151006072727.LATF21122.eastrmfepo203.cox.net@eastrmimpo305> for ; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:27:27 -0400 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([72.209.245.76]) by eastrmimpo305 with cox id RjTS1r0091fdgeY01jTS0n; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:27:26 -0400 X-CT-Class: Clean X-CT-Score: 0.00 X-CT-RefID: str=0001.0A020201.561377DE.010B,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-CT-Spam: 0 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=KuOTLxqN c=1 sm=1 a=Z0mTN5v9aXapGpeIoCKAZQ==:17 a=8YJikuA2AAAA:8 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=-Z7fMWaMxmQ_KtTQMF4A:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=Z0mTN5v9aXapGpeIoCKAZQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none To: llg-board@lojban.org References: <20150928074806.GE6008@stodi.digitalkingdom.org> <3B7A849A-1570-440F-9EEF-07423F8F11B9@gmail.com> From: Bob LeChevalier Message-ID: <561377F0.4070201@lojban.org> Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 03:27:44 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Spam-Note: SpamAssassin invocation failed Subject: Re: [llg-board] CLL source licensing X-BeenThere: llg-board@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-board@lojban.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Errors-To: llg-board-bounces@lojban.org On 10/5/2015 8:19 AM, Gleki Arxokuna wrote: > Yes, I agree. > > 2015-10-05 15:16 GMT+03:00 And Rosta >: > > Absolutely. Thus the motion is seconded. If no objection (including from Robin) by end of the day (UT) 8 October, the motion will be adopted. lojbab PS Can anyone tell me what this bangu@lojban.org is that sometimes appears as a second addressee. I don't know who reads that traffic, and it effectively evades the confidential nature of Board meetings. _______________________________________________ llg-board mailing list llg-board@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board