Received: from localhost ([::1]:41038 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bOeci-0007RO-NQ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:28:16 -0700 Received: from mail-lf0-f49.google.com ([209.85.215.49]:36733) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bOecc-0007R7-7X for llg-board@lojban.org; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:28:14 -0700 Received: by mail-lf0-f49.google.com with SMTP id g62so2108496lfe.3 for ; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:28:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to; bh=eaQWf0WpGjd/nndhfWL98VF3KzRq+aTzDAjtsFQxSBs=; b=yMvB8JUlNHuaW8RLu8QZNoueOvbbD23Vrz0Bd8+QsUB4c+aVoAiWtdi+JH0bM2dn7F z7AJiTPPJXoC4nr/Hi1gK0BqTxZvoQ72F7R8FA4aHKFlr37aVC+Jl6SCMg+lsD+I6EXQ M/szldOGoVZhzq76rEUY7wWradV6C/atyNxPxPJk4PJ+ZteTZhY+2P3MNGQT+9ywUuMM 8CtmC4EkA3efE88ncMbQM6jbTUHVGBRaQDq0aHou0vEZcCl8Yg+sXE7ee52plZiXMNzM 9lpryhny28s397CahN6PZID+dDflvdt8Atf+W1jqxu530xRWQD/JMnDKha2HMsTdPPXD UTpQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to; bh=eaQWf0WpGjd/nndhfWL98VF3KzRq+aTzDAjtsFQxSBs=; b=fVX6u1I0/lAWIBn6ybWezZo7C05Invt1elt7u6vQ1wCtv3eIYswhjq+lNWdGr6BnTW m4L1ZmeondUV2pzikQDEkHyQ6awd9BcYXd7qXiS9f+xlEQXIrqt6h3OjQduYn1Xvbuuu UsQeHSsZtZC5kLFW4yZWRW6zPXWgPvsrk6R6hxtRMi5zqpNz0pRFEeCfdDOjXMAbHX9s /WNjPI1MejBFNYB6J/CaZmp7DPxM+RveBzGUlZyMbe6SfcSkNMOT8FmNAYHCXpHI5rvx Xov74KPq5OALILhWuTqA1xc5LKZ6jEXdxNxCn9nIp0vlABqFg0VPY8DLPvZ5KkGBmst+ S2zA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tLkAUlI3W5SxNwK11tHhQVNcH0VSRYOO3rW42ee5676ku72sFXcYO2cD62RUU18aGFJ+S7lnJAMl11/6w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.148.136 with SMTP id w130mr11712031lfd.2.1468733281998; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.17.100 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Jul 2016 22:28:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <165b7ba7-6d02-555b-5dbf-5ad4aa252075@lojban.org> References: <77EE71B1-1949-49B5-A7E2-976EAFB60D00@gmail.com> <165b7ba7-6d02-555b-5dbf-5ad4aa252075@lojban.org> Date: Sun, 17 Jul 2016 08:28:01 +0300 Message-ID: From: Gleki Arxokuna To: "llg-board@lojban.org" X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [llg-board] LLG-Board Meeting Call to order and roll call X-BeenThere: llg-board@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-board@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============2113908550881679750==" Errors-To: llg-board-bounces@lojban.org --===============2113908550881679750== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114023fc8b1f160537ce1da2 --001a114023fc8b1f160537ce1da2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 What about adjourning 2015's llg meeting? Em domingo, 17 de julho de 2016, Bob LeChevalier escreveu: > On 7/16/2016 12:46 PM, Curtis Franks wrote: > >> No conversation has been made in some time. Are there any outstanding >> issues? Do we have any other goals that we want to discuss? If neither, >> then I propose that we adjourn. >> > > The Board meeting has historically been continuous, and does not adjourn. > The Board could choose to change this practice, but then we need to call > the roll each time etc. Keeping the meeting open allowed us to deal with > issues quickly when they came up. But it also assumes that the Board > members are generally paying attention to emails (or tell us when you are > offline for a while). > > There are plenty of outstanding issues, since we haven't yet actually done > *anything*. mukti is here visiting me today, and I intend to post more > after he leaves. > > But thanks for someone finally asking! It is nice to know someone cares. > > lojbab > > _______________________________________________ > llg-board mailing list > llg-board@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board > --001a114023fc8b1f160537ce1da2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable What about adjourning 2015's llg meeting?=C2=A0

Em domingo, 17 d= e julho de 2016, Bob LeChevalier <l= ojbab@lojban.org> escreveu:
On 7/1= 6/2016 12:46 PM, Curtis Franks wrote:
No conversation has been made in some time. Are there any outstanding
issues? Do we have any other goals that we want to discuss? If neither,
then I propose that we adjourn.

The Board meeting has historically been continuous, and does not adjourn.= =C2=A0 The Board could choose to change this practice, but then we need to = call the roll each time etc.=C2=A0 Keeping the meeting open allowed us to d= eal with issues quickly when they came up.=C2=A0 But it also assumes that t= he Board members are generally paying attention to emails (or tell us when = you are offline for a while).

There are plenty of outstanding issues, since we haven't yet actually d= one *anything*.=C2=A0 mukti is here visiting me today, and I intend to post= more after he leaves.

But thanks for someone finally asking!=C2=A0 It is nice to know someone car= es.

lojbab

_______________________________________________
llg-board mailing list
llg-board@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board
--001a114023fc8b1f160537ce1da2-- --===============2113908550881679750== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ llg-board mailing list llg-board@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board --===============2113908550881679750==--