Received: from localhost ([::1]:60070 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bmSa3-0006fq-D7; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:27:55 -0700 Received: from mail-yw0-f172.google.com ([209.85.161.172]:36758) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1bmSZx-0006f9-E7 for llg-board@lojban.org; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:27:53 -0700 Received: by mail-yw0-f172.google.com with SMTP id t67so22604373ywg.3 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:27:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=o4aHIJWw0mPG3wz0U12QswR6DZaknjm9UwwFYUzC45o=; b=MM9Jev0WqgZtpTUeFQYIeJDjPXAt4o/MAKosnwjbeT7gytVfhZesGWYp8DO0CE/NWR CPKsfJff6hCOnzhF7295NSG9do9Axid6/b8v1Sebax8CH3cJWsRLfemEFz+cMqLvCxDj ec59e1ox0lyXW8TAzRa3n+TqevnVltGPVeCv5CeYIkVYXjIjfNx4lj7fbiwov8hYyzyk cRZhu462btno6qw/O1gVNRk+SBLgR4+3MGGjhK7rWPg/pVylNaRjhrvnPtLl8H3fDI0Z OjKCp2H3YjqPn4bSBK46FYc6MwH8uIlVUdN7rydEWTab7/tffUi/snXPw0Fr0VeNl8XG 9+9Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=o4aHIJWw0mPG3wz0U12QswR6DZaknjm9UwwFYUzC45o=; b=AKPNy00VWpj6kpZL2o0XsTw6n+kaRjoOZGnlXt7Pp9dP8drcYMRSx6xy+C+8lmab2+ wxgAXCfPdg3tmOLsxDgIvQUC4+x3pqbPSMXL1ye9T07djgK/AgZYMp3kC8vrLdFpx3DU vC6mSez6sFGReBuu6047doMEiGmxJ5rxDrk9NAS5ga/SpEJFXkbbvk7xE2VI8dsbCJqP UO+rqSi+ArfYX+49Yeg/pPEZ33+WkMI2qASC+5PMe+9jgbbkd5aReRKov18S55af9ztE 9VhP4vYtNq736ey30rxfNIdv8/DmYpeKYLAs2pqr4r8dLzcaRgcB7K5c/jzvKfjvZtHi X4Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNSQXk/LWYQ26BMW3ZJjk3lDiba0NEUkZjvCLxZbwnvgcAE2sooWGzAmn5N79zM6IPVOgX978T6yjdDFA== X-Received: by 10.13.231.199 with SMTP id q190mr33393518ywe.26.1474406863344; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:27:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.176.7.70 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 14:27:42 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <78461A3E-B0CC-44D6-8DC1-C40FBB85E04B@gmail.com> From: Curtis Franks Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 17:27:42 -0400 Message-ID: To: llg-board@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) X-Spam_score: -2.0 X-Spam_score_int: -19 X-Spam_bar: -- Subject: Re: [llg-board] Planning the 2016 Annual Meeting X-BeenThere: llg-board@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-board@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0691090604723021061==" Errors-To: llg-board-bounces@lojban.org --===============0691090604723021061== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=94eb2c081552581ed5053cf71980 --94eb2c081552581ed5053cf71980 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 1. Definite yes on front-loading. 2. I think that we should aim for a Saturday m and, if we do multiple weeks, that they should be consecutive and number at least three. 3. I brought up a list of topics in a previous email thread. 4. How do we want to communicate? I would prefer text I think, but I am not strong on this point. On Sep 20, 2016 16:07, "Riley Martinez-Lynch" wrote: coi jbopre I would like to start a discussion about how and when to hold the 2016 annual meeting of the members. I=E2=80=99m bringing the question first to t= he board, since we=E2=80=99re empowered to take action on this question, but w= ould also be glad to bring it to the members list if the sense of the board is that we would benefit from wider discussion before taking action. Given the drawn-out nature of the last meeting, I am renewing my call to change the way that we conduct the business of the meeting. I would like to suggest that we draw up the agenda for the meeting well in advance so that people have a chance to debate any action items before the meeting starts. If we do this, I am confident we can conduct the business of the meeting in a few hours over IRC or Slack. I would like to see the meeting scheduled in such a way to maximize convenience to the members. I think we should propose several times and poll the membership to decide which time. If it turns out that the time chosen isn=E2=80=99t possible for any member,= I would be glad to personally follow up with that person to ensure that they have a proxy to represent their positions. Since the meeting would be focused on business rather than debate, what they would be proxying would be mostly limited to formalities: The casting of votes on issues identified in advance. If we start this conversation now, I expect we can arrive at an agenda by early November, which would allow us to both start and finish the meeting in the appropriate calendar year. Please let me know your thoughts: 1. What do you think about front-loading the debate on the agenda and executing business separately? 2. What days or times do you think might allow the most members to participate in a real time meeting? 3. What would you like to see on the agenda for the upcoming meeting? Thank you! =E2=80=94Riley no=E2=80=99u la mukti _______________________________________________ llg-board mailing list llg-board@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board --94eb2c081552581ed5053cf71980 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

1. Definite yes on front-loading.
2. I think that we should aim for a Saturday m and, if we do multiple weeks= , that they should be consecutive and number at least three.
3. I brought up a list of topics in a previous email thread.

4. How do we want to communicate? I would prefer text I thin= k, but I am not strong on this point.


On Sep 20, 2016 1= 6:07, "Riley Martinez-Lynch" <shunpiker@gmail.com> wrote:
coi jbopre

I would like to start a discussion about how and when to hold the 2016 annu= al meeting of the members. I=E2=80=99m bringing the question first to the b= oard, since we=E2=80=99re empowered to take action on this question, but wo= uld also be glad to bring it to the members list if the sense of the board = is that we would benefit from wider discussion before taking action.

Given the drawn-out nature of the last meeting, I am renewing my call to ch= ange the way that we conduct the business of the meeting. I would like to s= uggest that we draw up the agenda for the meeting well in advance so that p= eople have a chance to debate any action items before the meeting starts.
If we do this, I am confident we can conduct the business of the meeting in= a few hours over IRC or Slack. I would like to see the meeting scheduled i= n such a way to maximize convenience to the members. I think we should prop= ose several times and poll the membership to decide which time.

If it turns out that the time chosen isn=E2=80=99t possible for any member,= I would be glad to personally follow up with that person to ensure that th= ey have a proxy to represent their positions. Since the meeting would be fo= cused on business rather than debate, what they would be proxying would be = mostly limited to formalities: The casting of votes on issues identified in= advance.

If we start this conversation now, I expect we can arrive at an agenda by e= arly November, which would allow us to both start and finish the meeting in= the appropriate calendar year.

Please let me know your thoughts:

1. What do you think about front-loading the debate on the agenda and execu= ting business separately?
2. What days or times do you think might allow the most members to particip= ate in a real time meeting?
3. What would you like to see on the agenda for the upcoming meeting?

Thank you!

=E2=80=94Riley no=E2=80=99u la mukti






_______________________________________________
llg-board mailing list
llg-board@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-bo= ard

--94eb2c081552581ed5053cf71980-- --===============0691090604723021061== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ llg-board mailing list llg-board@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board --===============0691090604723021061==--