In-Reply-To: <FD8957D5-ABC5-486B-8496-2B6D562F6529@lojban.org>
References: <FD8957D5-ABC5-486B-8496-2B6D562F6529@lojban.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Karen Stein <comcaresvcs@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2016 16:04:17 -0500
To: llg-board@lojban.org
Message-ID: <EA854DCD-381C-4092-909B-B47FC29DAEBC@gmail.com>
X-Spam_score: -2.0
X-Spam_score_int: -19
X-Spam_bar: --
Subject: Re: [llg-board] Mailing addresses
X-BeenThere: llg-board@lojban.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: <llg-board.lojban.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/options/llg-board>,
 <mailto:llg-board-request@lojban.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/private/llg-board/>
List-Post: <mailto:llg-board@lojban.org>
List-Help: <mailto:llg-board-request@lojban.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board>,
 <mailto:llg-board-request@lojban.org?subject=subscribe>
Reply-To: llg-board@lojban.org
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============5508051358019510412=="
Errors-To: llg-board-bounces@lojban.org

--===============5508051358019510412==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----CR7FN70QLR79OIR2F3AR1JYBETUDYR"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

------CR7FN70QLR79OIR2F3AR1JYBETUDYR
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8

I understand why Riley purposes concluding any 2016 meeting within 2016. This makes very good sense to me, though I believe holding it over a period of just 15 days seems unmanageable short if any discussion is to occur, particularly as this time of year is hectic for most cultures and people around the world. Having one day of discussion over IRC is not a useful solution as such a discussion precludes input by anyone not available at a specific time. We have already discussed issues of time zone and outside life conflicts with such. I suggest instead that any items requiring more discussion than can occur via email in the time specified be postponed to the 2017 meeting. I have no problem with avoiding issues with required notice for considering bylaw changes by postponing such votes.

karis

On November 25, 2016 10:07:51 AM EST, LLG Secretary <shunpiker@gmail.com> wrote:
>Hello board members!
>
>I need to collect your mailing addresses to be included in the annual
>filing for LLG. Please send them to me at this email address
>(secretary@). I will follow up tomorrow (Saturday) with anyone who I
>haven’t heard from by then. We need to make an end-of-month filing
>deadline.
>
>In other news, I’d like to propose that we hold the 2016 meeting in
>such a way that we can guarantee that it concludes within this calendar
>year. Which is to say, I propose that we waive the notice period
>required for bylaw amendments. If there are pending bylaw amendments, I
>propose that we schedule the 2017 meeting early in the year to consider
>them.
>
>In order to expedite the meeting I’d like to propose that we place it
>on a fixed timetable. Here is a rough idea of what I have in mind:
>
>Friday, December 4 - Sunday December 6: Meeting called to order, roll
>call begins
>Sunday, December 6: Roll call ends, presentation of minutes and officer
>reports, call for old and new business agenda
>Monday, December 7 - Saturday, December 12: Discussion of business
>Sunday, December 13: IRC session to discuss business
>Monday, December 14 - Saturday, December 19: Voting on any items that
>require voting; any items that require further discussion before a vote
>should be tabled for next meeting
>Sunday, December 20: Meeting is adjourned
>
>Thoughts? Questions? Objections? Please speak up.
>
>Send me your addresses. Thank you!
>
>—Riley
>_______________________________________________
>llg-board mailing list
>llg-board@lojban.org
>http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board

------CR7FN70QLR79OIR2F3AR1JYBETUDYR
Content-Type: text/html;
 charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

<html><head></head><body>I understand why Riley purposes concluding any 2016 meeting within 2016. This makes very good sense to me, though I believe holding it over a period of just 15 days seems unmanageable short if any discussion is to occur, particularly as this time of year is hectic for most cultures and people around the world. Having one day of discussion over IRC is not a useful solution as such a discussion precludes input by anyone not available at a specific time. We have already discussed issues of time zone and outside life conflicts with such. I suggest instead that any items requiring more discussion than can occur via email in the time specified be postponed to the 2017 meeting. I have no problem with avoiding issues with required notice for considering bylaw changes by postponing such votes.<br>
<br>
karis<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On November 25, 2016 10:07:51 AM EST, LLG Secretary &lt;shunpiker@gmail.com&gt; wrote:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
<pre class="k9mail">Hello board members!<br /><br />I need to collect your mailing addresses to be included in the annual filing for LLG. Please send them to me at this email address (secretary@). I will follow up tomorrow (Saturday) with anyone who I haven’t heard from by then. We need to make an end-of-month filing deadline.<br /><br />In other news, I’d like to propose that we hold the 2016 meeting in such a way that we can guarantee that it concludes within this calendar year. Which is to say, I propose that we waive the notice period required for bylaw amendments. If there are pending bylaw amendments, I propose that we schedule the 2017 meeting early in the year to consider them.<br /><br />In order to expedite the meeting I’d like to propose that we place it on a fixed timetable. Here is a rough idea of what I have in mind:<br /><br />Friday, December 4 - Sunday December 6: Meeting called to order, roll call begins<br />Sunday, December 6: Roll call ends, presentation
of minutes and officer reports, call for old and new business agenda<br />Monday, December 7 - Saturday, December 12: Discussion of business<br />Sunday, December 13: IRC session to discuss business<br />Monday, December 14 - Saturday, December 19: Voting on any items that require voting; any items that require further discussion before a vote should be tabled for next meeting<br />Sunday, December 20: Meeting is adjourned<br /><br />Thoughts? Questions? Objections? Please speak up.<br /><br />Send me your addresses. Thank you!<br /><br />—Riley<br /><hr /><br />llg-board mailing list<br />llg-board@lojban.org<br /><a href="http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board">http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board</a><br /></pre></blockquote></div></body></html>
------CR7FN70QLR79OIR2F3AR1JYBETUDYR--


--===============5508051358019510412==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

_______________________________________________
llg-board mailing list
llg-board@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board

--===============5508051358019510412==--