Received: from localhost ([::1]:48082 helo=stodi.digitalkingdom.org) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1d5RG8-0005LK-SS; Mon, 01 May 2017 23:26:04 -0700 Received: from mail-yw0-f176.google.com ([209.85.161.176]:33213) by stodi.digitalkingdom.org with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1d5RG6-0005KT-2K for llg-board@lojban.org; Mon, 01 May 2017 23:26:03 -0700 Received: by mail-yw0-f176.google.com with SMTP id 203so64246398ywe.0 for ; Mon, 01 May 2017 23:26:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=P8dcj6CfFeHyCS+wwiSg2x7be5q0DlFXuIbYABB1uYg=; b=sOhDcA32Nl9ilmLpURCP3ria5NXM8CIfaUlGgrJAAkPLWyQxgtnhWL8oRDBp4Z9usi Iwxft111gSyy0+/RvVZLu3N/m8VJU43LmFbpFrzyt90rcq7WK9UMc+miIf4yg8kDU2/i fOrGi5dAx3YNC6UlvmwoiSpvOr6kiZIbhW89/c6Iox1TgPCG1/i4kmTwLcjmXkl58QaR cqNCVQRGkSp/F/WwM3AmxuNX8XqDOB9rX/d/2hJUNocH1wkINAsqW2E/7wIw4c7zUJLJ 81qRi99rg2Xp8HAvvScdSCDR/7mIvlPazopWM74p3iwMDFhlGrSAh1GO9tQm8QXIt4uN DFPw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=P8dcj6CfFeHyCS+wwiSg2x7be5q0DlFXuIbYABB1uYg=; b=TIXtQK84WnjN2c9+fcSB5EKP6SxoFBHExDeQ86sPvFbPST6kwQOJveEca94pdwwE+L 6pLlxKKsdBbP7In9i7jDOeuIDkJcSYZWTJFwIY4+xPYAIJY7UErAmNEUWla2uWKfwusj tqhcPmegrTx+n2/NrtsSMrTTHUV+HmNN9HFwVdgUB3aYkZ2yZ1b34cePro4YviMho7CO uV8YsFvcXe+UMJzMpMcEeRsLNz83KUsVJQ3okVpVLCoP+LBzohKHSXHOvTSe3eb2JXzf Gka4KjkbeWYw7hYGAXanHySau9mYPVtB5tb8fuEj/A/XGJfmgxBZalMsEn1tACSi3vOz K81A== X-Gm-Message-State: AN3rC/4WsI1vPR6THERBOvjvlPtnN29mn9GRjZ1ENAZXH0Q6sDErnnzW DV1ARBZSVZ0SgN6oEsAo9oxd2Vk0Tg== X-Received: by 10.129.70.8 with SMTP id t8mr25172270ywa.201.1493706355696; Mon, 01 May 2017 23:25:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.13.202.131 with HTTP; Mon, 1 May 2017 23:25:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gleki Arxokuna Date: Tue, 2 May 2017 09:25:15 +0300 Message-ID: To: llg-board@lojban.org X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) X-Spam_score: -0.5 X-Spam_score_int: -4 X-Spam_bar: / Subject: Re: [llg-board] [lisaflemerick@yahoo.com: lojban.net] X-BeenThere: llg-board@lojban.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: llg-board@lojban.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8051601722280580369==" Errors-To: llg-board-bounces@lojban.org --===============8051601722280580369== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114d71a8baeb52054e849c82 --001a114d71a8baeb52054e849c82 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Another ta'o zei pinka from me. In terms of SEO this domain is no good since it was never used for Lojban-related activities. There are plenty of free second level domains === "lojban". For historical record lojban.ru was once used by Russian community, it was resurrected a few years ago only to be shut down some months later because no one was interested in visiting it since the community wasn't (and isn't) growing that fast. 2017-05-01 22:30 GMT+03:00 Curtis Franks : > I ultimately agree with the rest. I was just throwing out the primary > concern that came to my mind, for the sake of consideration. > > On May 1, 2017 12:29, "Bob LeChevalier" wrote: > >> On 4/30/2017 2:33 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote: >> >>> I have not verified this. Do we care? >>> >> >> IMHO >> >> Probably not enough to pay. These days there may be an untold number of >> lojban.xxx URLs forms that could be reserved. We don't really need them, >> and there is little reason anyone else would want them. >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> llg-board mailing list >> llg-board@lojban.org >> http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board >> > > _______________________________________________ > llg-board mailing list > llg-board@lojban.org > http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board > > --001a114d71a8baeb52054e849c82 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Another ta'o zei pinka from me.

In = terms of SEO this domain is no good since it was never used for Lojban-rela= ted activities.
There are plenty of free second level domains =3D= =3D=3D "lojban".
For historical record lojban.ru was once used by Russian community, it was resur= rected a few years ago only to be shut down some months later because no on= e was interested in visiting it since the community wasn't (and isn'= ;t) growing that fast.



2017-05-01 22:30 GMT+03:00 = Curtis Franks <curtis.w.franks@gmail.com>:
I ultimately agree with the rest= . I was just throwing out the primary concern that came to my mind, for the= sake of consideration.

On May 1, 2017 12:29, &= quot;Bob LeChevalier" <lojbab@lojban.org> wrote:
On 4/30/2017 2:33 PM, Robin Lee Powell wrote:
I have not verified this.=C2=A0 Do we care?

IMHO

Probably not enough to pay.=C2=A0 These days there may be an untold number = of lojban.xxx URLs forms that could be reserved.=C2=A0 We don't really = need them, and there is little reason anyone else would want them.


_______________________________________________
llg-board mailing list
llg-board@lojban.= org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-bo= ard

_______________________________________________
llg-board mailing list
llg-board@lojban.org
http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-bo= ard


--001a114d71a8baeb52054e849c82-- --===============8051601722280580369== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ llg-board mailing list llg-board@lojban.org http://mail.lojban.org/mailman/listinfo/llg-board --===============8051601722280580369==--