Return-path: <52227-93744-396881-13067-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.mindpaces.sa.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Wed, 08 Jun 2022 03:56:34 -0700 Received: from vista.mindpaces.sa.com ([141.11.190.183]:39027) by d05c5d92ccf2 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <52227-93744-396881-13067-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.mindpaces.sa.com>) id 1nytMV-0029Kt-1D for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 08 Jun 2022 03:56:32 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=mindpaces.sa.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=TacticalDashCamera@mindpaces.sa.com; bh=wKaKmT5VreD4V0H4D9BJWGtHFQg=; b=kHvDFDojMqDDvV66UQ8ytfgJTOGIigj/iHez3eb2oGhKDqHV87AzfbONirVyS//cpdvv9aInsPnL vrDmY4JyHzMMsEN4H2OiImWgtlIRp+HWl/3Nx+lboegQsgEWVf1e1UApoBZCQRVcffuzptycwlRC XJ8SBAUukKaKRD/TlCY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=mindpaces.sa.com; b=g9+KZzfpctG1vDlftB4o03t6w9EOqkq+Kh+EB5DEkjKTFB06M+IHb7BBVVE04sNo75njzKSIEtwO ANIWWAftjzZwoWSzKEGTNXuu1yWSoBe/BE9Rgm3AZ31s4p1su467tUgNtNGOoIfEnrnT71nMkzoq jZCsFo5GW1AHlvYfBiE=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="33779ff1b1c3b61096185b493c209e0c_16e30_60e51" Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2022 06:52:47 -0400 From: "Dashboard Camera" Reply-To: "Tactical Dash Camera" Subject: RE: Customer Service Follow-Up (URGENT) To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 1.9 (+) X-Spam_score: 1.9 X-Spam_score_int: 19 X-Spam_bar: + X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bcda1c85505f", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: RE: Customer Service Follow-Up (URGENT) http://mindpaces.sa.com/eOETHjyUg4k2gobdoB74eVz3-f-Akm20yxR4Z4vQ4QW46CBC http://mindpaces.sa.com/Ef8zKq9aoLdONptAICgEylplnH6z6hGgk7mzNlsh9Pk2Kv5O Content analysis details: (1.9 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: mindpaces.sa.com] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: mindpaces.sa.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid --33779ff1b1c3b61096185b493c209e0c_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit RE: Customer Service Follow-Up (URGENT) http://mindpaces.sa.com/eOETHjyUg4k2gobdoB74eVz3-f-Akm20yxR4Z4vQ4QW46CBC http://mindpaces.sa.com/Ef8zKq9aoLdONptAICgEylplnH6z6hGgk7mzNlsh9Pk2Kv5O \ornithologist George Dawson Rowley noted differences between the Vienna and Liverpool specimens and named a new species based on the latter: P. stanleyi, named after Lord Stanley. He believed that the Liverpool specimen was a juvenile from Lord Howe Island or New Zealand, and continued to believe that the Vienna specimen was from Norfolk Island. Despite naming the new species, Rowley considered the possibility that P. stanleyi was an albino Australasian swamphen and considered the Vienna bird more similar to the takah?. In 1901, the ornithologist Henry Ogg Forbes had the Liverpool specimen dismounted so he could examine it for damage. Forbes found it similar enough to the Vienna specimen to belong to the same species, N. alba. The zoologist Walter Rothschild considered the two species distinct from each other in 1907, but placed them both in the genus Notornis. Rothschild thought that the image published by Phillip in 1789 depicted N. stanleyi from Lord Howe Island, and the image published by White in 1790 showed N. alba from Norfolk Island. He disagreed that the specimens were albinos, thinking instead that they were evolving into a white species. Rothschild published an illustration of N. alba by Keulemans where it is similar to a takah?, inaccurately showing it with dark primary feathers, although the Vienna specimen on which it was based is all white. In 1910, the ornithologist Tom Iredale demonstrated that there was no proof of the white swamphen existing anywhere but on Lord Howe Island and noted that early visitors to Norfolk Island (such as Captain James Cook and Lieutenant Philip Gidley King) did not mention the bird. In 1913, after examining the Vienna specimen, Iredale concluded that the bird belonged in the genus Porphyrio and did not --33779ff1b1c3b61096185b493c209e0c_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
This is an urgent Customer Service email.

Our customer service department recently notified you of your eligibility to receive a FREE Dashcam from our friends at American Tactical Sports.

Today, they want to let you know that, unfortunately, if you don’t act in the next 6 hours… we cannot guarantee this complimentary Dashcam will still be available to you.

Although there were 500 of these set aside to hand out Free...

Demand has been far greater than anticipated -- and they’re close to being gone.

That’s why you must claim your Free Dashcam now if you want one.

These little automatic Dashcams have a ton of uses:

Stop fraudulent claims against your insurance

Prove you weren’t at fault in vehicular accidents

Protect yourself from Police Misconduct

They also shoot in full 1080p HD, and have a crystal clear night-vision mode as well.



But like I said…

There aren’t many of these Free Dashcams left.

And once this giveaway closes, you’ll likely have to pay full price ($69) to get one.

So don’t dilly dally…

Grab yours now while they’re still available Free.

P.S. -- Many car insurance companies are offering deep discounts to drivers who use these Dashcams.

So if yours is one of them, you’ll practically make money by grabbing one of these Free while.


















ornithologist George Dawson Rowley noted differences between the Vienna and Liverpool specimens and named a new species based on the latter: P. stanleyi, named after Lord Stanley. He believed that the Liverpool specimen was a juvenile from Lord Howe Island or New Zealand, and continued to believe that the Vienna specimen was from Norfolk Island. Despite naming the new species, Rowley considered the possibility that P. stanleyi was an albino Australasian swamphen and considered the Vienna bird more similar to the takah?. In 1901, the ornithologist Henry Ogg Forbes had the Liverpool specimen dismounted so he could examine it for damage. Forbes found it similar enough to the Vienna specimen to belong to the same species, N. alba. The zoologist Walter Rothschild considered the two species distinct from each other in 1907, but placed them both in the genus Notornis. Rothschild thought that the image published by Phillip in 1789 depicted N. stanleyi from Lord Howe Island, and the image published by White in 1790 showed N. alba from Norfolk Island. He disagreed that the specimens were albinos, thinking instead that they were evolving into a white species. Rothschild published an illustration of N. alba by Keulemans where it is similar to a takah?, inaccurately showing it with dark primary feathers, although the Vienna specimen on which it was based is all white. In 1910, the ornithologist Tom Iredale demonstrated that there was no proof of the white swamphen existing anywhere but on Lord Howe Island and noted that early visitors to Norfolk Island (such as Captain James Cook and Lieutenant Philip Gidley King) did not mention the bird. In 1913, after examining the Vienna specimen, Iredale concluded that the bird belonged in the genus Porphyrio and did not
--33779ff1b1c3b61096185b493c209e0c_16e30_60e51--