Return-path: <52488-93744-396881-10584-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.givethumbsup.ru.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 02:30:51 -0700 Received: from rush.genepower.za.com ([141.11.190.165]:55645 helo=dat.givethumbsup.ru.com) by d05c5d92ccf2 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <52488-93744-396881-10584-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.givethumbsup.ru.com>) id 1o1PMO-002UJx-Kv for llg-board@lojban.org; Wed, 15 Jun 2022 02:30:50 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=givethumbsup.ru.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=RevolutionaryEarcleaner@givethumbsup.ru.com; bh=+ezwYPkxBOubEiZ5Q9ZovXvrchU=; b=p0gv3EyhHJAwMFGpB3wUQ+vjsE9Bj9kct6+BBmN42i6WOkrZ4HPv0rlxVTrXGwFh+lBqnPi1DXRO g1Ij50OQwQnxwE3jK2rnCR7cEefQ2G38tceMWwWPgJzdc0WS7bddK/6fpMlsYIQtGs2c5xzPjLfb ZGtVEuzN6/7a6H7h28w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=givethumbsup.ru.com; b=aS/Pus2da6sst7jbbW0dYBIaHsXKcZ5Av32S4Dg5dxdCfBQmVpaHzWWPmDapB0jjI97SOvNekGnu gB26kKBYx3QuzGvpcOABcRoOJptUHWorLLYCWl1vDZeM72sc/pYjDcGd+WMzyUY4UKZ9TcFUy8cS DPUrU73FciM71l19O+w=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="2418e8fb7d58f315c8c8332c4de7e995_16e30_60e51" Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 05:27:20 -0400 From: "Tvidler Cleans Ears" Reply-To: "Tvidler Cleans Ears" Subject: An EarWax Cleaner that's Safe for Your Ears and the Environment To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Score: 4.6 (++++) X-Spam_score: 4.6 X-Spam_score_int: 46 X-Spam_bar: ++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bcda1c85505f", has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: An EarWax Cleaner that's Safe for Your Ears and the Environment http://givethumbsup.ru.com/fruv9THdetsvlnEUeE_9ZZwAUR-56fawvDzOTd7i3PQeZ8TGkA http://givethumbsup.ru.com/atmxciA1-ctilDd7hqTqCy5d7gSnuFoMDUyvq4Q4L3yKzcmwUg Content analysis details: (4.6 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5050] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: givethumbsup.ru.com] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: givethumbsup.ru.com] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [141.11.190.165 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid --2418e8fb7d58f315c8c8332c4de7e995_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit An EarWax Cleaner that's Safe for Your Ears and the Environment http://givethumbsup.ru.com/fruv9THdetsvlnEUeE_9ZZwAUR-56fawvDzOTd7i3PQeZ8TGkA http://givethumbsup.ru.com/atmxciA1-ctilDd7hqTqCy5d7gSnuFoMDUyvq4Q4L3yKzcmwUg English, the linguistic controversy stems partly from the fact that there is no general rule for how the letter sequence gi is to be pronounced, with the hard g prevailing in words such as gift, and the soft g being used in others such as gin. In Old English, g would make the soft g sound as well as y's consonant sound, and when the hard g was added, both its hard and soft variations persisted when followed by i. An analysis of 269 words by linguist Michael Dow found near-tied results on whether a hard or soft g was more appropriate based on other English words; the results varied somewhat depending on what parameters were used. Of the 105 words that contained gi somewhere in the word, 68 used the soft g while only 37 employed its counterpart. However, the hard g words were found to be significantly more common in everyday English; comparatively obscure words like flibbertigibbet and tergiversate, both pronounced with a soft g, were included in the list of 68 soft gi words. When the prevalence of each word was taken into account, it was found that the hard and soft g appeared in nearly equal frequencies in gi words. No clear favorite was found by only using the words that begin with gi, nor by only using words with one syllable such as gift and gin. In her coverage of the piece, Canadian linguist Gretchen McCulloch theorizes that since the --2418e8fb7d58f315c8c8332c4de7e995_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
 
Finally, an Earwax Cleaner that's Safe for Your Ears and the Environment

Have you ever used Earwax Cleaner to clean your ears?

The little white sticks with cotton edges are not supposed to be used for that!
Check the box and you'll find a notice saying not to place them in your ear canal.

Putting cotton swabs in your ear canal is dangerous.
You can break the fragile mid ear bones or pierce the ear drum.

There's a better way to clean your ears!



Tvidler saves the day

Tvidler was a little tool that grips the earwax and pulls it out instead of pushing it further as cotton swabs do. They look like tiny soft corkscrews - you just need to put the soft end into your ear and pull the wax out.



See for Yourself how Qgrips Works!






















English, the linguistic controversy stems partly from the fact that there is no general rule for how the letter sequence gi is to be pronounced, with the hard g prevailing in words such as gift, and the soft g being used in others such as gin. In Old English, g would make the soft g sound as well as y's consonant sound, and when the hard g was added, both its hard and soft variations persisted when followed by i. An analysis of 269 words by linguist Michael Dow found near-tied results on whether a hard or soft g was more appropriate based on other English words; the results varied somewhat depending on what parameters were used. Of the 105 words that contained gi somewhere in the word, 68 used the soft g while only 37 employed its counterpart. However, the hard g words were found to be significantly more common in everyday English; comparatively obscure words like flibbertigibbet and tergiversate, both pronounced with a soft g, were included in the list of 68 soft gi words. When the prevalence of each word was taken into account, it was found that the hard and soft g appeared in nearly equal frequencies in gi words. No clear favorite was found by only using the words that begin with gi, nor by only using words with one syllable such as gift and gin. In her coverage of the piece, Canadian linguist Gretchen McCulloch theorizes that since the
--2418e8fb7d58f315c8c8332c4de7e995_16e30_60e51--