Return-path: <52547-93744-396881-13291-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.stimulio.za.com> Envelope-to: llg-board@lojban.org Delivery-date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:44:03 -0700 Received: from rouge.stimulio.za.com ([109.236.49.38]:39348) by d05c5d92ccf2 with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from <52547-93744-396881-13291-llg+2Dboard=lojban.org@mail.stimulio.za.com>) id 1o1qj2-002Yzm-PI for llg-board@lojban.org; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:44:02 -0700 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=k1; d=stimulio.za.com; h=Mime-Version:Content-Type:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Message-ID; i=OnlineJobQuiz@stimulio.za.com; bh=WtDR5Wj8e8hHPYufHMk6OI5//mA=; b=CwS05RvuazN6LpLmLK0mXmihD8HnzoGoFZASNJDELnczc1KrBumF7Olt6unUAJgJ+W1A/WuCUAi7 mrvUkdnG6Xv8/ADQRRAzm4p4fPwr9r+QpgwfXmsvr/V//MOy6WrtBC+YsIQgVat4sQs5OyUjJfVy oxTP2LSlhsXs38wBl8s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=k1; d=stimulio.za.com; b=plWlkEMx65nYBE2o2Clh3m73iwT4uuvZuYjtR4o4Hk/ikXNoVCNtQdE0LBdhzp85BNZ2o5o1/9ZO sYGjqQtQJVInSEXnmtTJlEVQHbcVSsXMMfZ96BmujZ80dW8L+v2fXwf8fx0DFdaWKVdDV/8+PODo A28Ep1+v1F4hyvLN0D8=; Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="ecc971833d8ff3e217ff87f6eaed8201_16e30_60e51" Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 10:13:39 -0400 From: "Social Media Job Quiz" Reply-To: "Make Money Online" Subject: Be paid for commenting on YouTube videos... To: Message-ID: X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Score: 5.0 (+++++) X-Spam_score: 5.0 X-Spam_score_int: 50 X-Spam_bar: +++++ X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "bcda1c85505f", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see @@CONTACT_ADDRESS@@ for details. Content preview: Be paid for commenting on YouTube videos... http://stimulio.za.com/iYaFe9IA9t7YsBeCmsMoTgVn_BUZIuM-r93Meah8cNiYoyo5Rw http://stimulio.za.com/W8AH2zKtY2ngUBAJEMmOLS6NRi6wIQ58-6_04gtaevSTRq0SkA Content analysis details: (5.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% [score: 0.5000] 0.0 URIBL_BLOCKED ADMINISTRATOR NOTICE: The query to URIBL was blocked. See http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/DnsBlocklists#dnsbl-block for more information. [URIs: stimulio.za.com] 1.2 URIBL_ABUSE_SURBL Contains an URL listed in the ABUSE SURBL blocklist [URIs: stimulio.za.com] 2.7 RCVD_IN_PSBL RBL: Received via a relay in PSBL [109.236.49.38 listed in psbl.surriel.com] 0.0 SPF_HELO_NONE SPF: HELO does not publish an SPF Record 0.0 T_SPF_PERMERROR SPF: test of record failed (permerror) 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message 0.4 PP_MIME_FAKE_ASCII_TEXT BODY: MIME text/plain claims to be ASCII but isn't 0.0 HTML_FONT_LOW_CONTRAST BODY: HTML font color similar or identical to background -0.1 DKIM_VALID_AU Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from author's domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID_EF Message has a valid DKIM or DK signature from envelope-from domain -0.1 DKIM_VALID Message has at least one valid DKIM or DK signature 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not necessarily valid --ecc971833d8ff3e217ff87f6eaed8201_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/plain; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Be paid for commenting on YouTube videos... http://stimulio.za.com/iYaFe9IA9t7YsBeCmsMoTgVn_BUZIuM-r93Meah8cNiYoyo5Rw http://stimulio.za.com/W8AH2zKtY2ngUBAJEMmOLS6NRi6wIQ58-6_04gtaevSTRq0SkA en philosophy of wiki – allowing anyone to edit content – does not ensure that every editor's intentions are well-mannered. For example, vandalism (changing wiki content to something offensive, adding nonsense, maliciously removing encyclopedic content, or deliberately adding incorrect information, such as hoax information) can be a major problem. On larger wiki sites, such as those run by the Wikimedia Foundation, vandalism can go unnoticed for some period of time. Wikis, because of their open nature, are susceptible to intentional disruption, known as "trolling". Wikis tend to take a soft-security approach to the problem of vandalism, making damage easy to undo rather than attempting to prevent damage. Larger wikis often employ sophisticated methods, such as bots that automatically identify and revert vandalism and JavaScript enhancements that show characters that have been added in each edit. In this way, vandalism can be limited to just "minor vandalism" or "sneaky vandalism", where the characters added/eliminated are so few that bots do not identify them and users do not pay much attention to them.[unreliable source] An example of a bot that reverts vandalism on Wikipedia is ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG can revert edits, often within minutes, if not seconds. The bot uses machine learning in lieu of heuristics. The amount of vandalism a wiki receives depends on how open the wiki is. For instance, some wikis allow unregistered users, identified by their IP addresses, to edit content, while others limit this function to just registered users. Edit wars can also occur as users repetitively revert a page to the version they favor. In some cases, editors with opposing views of which content should appear or what formatting style should be used will change and re-change each other's edits. This results in the page being "unstable" from a general user's perspective, because each time a general user comes to the page, it may look different. Some wiki software allows an administrator to stop such edit wars by locking a page from further editing until a decision has been made on what version of the page woul --ecc971833d8ff3e217ff87f6eaed8201_16e30_60e51 Content-Type: text/html; Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Newsletter
 

 


Previously you entered your details into our online job database and you’ve just been matched with an online YouTube job.

The job pays $1,000+ per week.

Has flexible hours (minimum 5 per week).

And, according to our database, your skill set matches perfectly.

Click here to apply now.

Your main role will be uploading premade videos to YouTube on behalf of small digital companies.

Don’t worry if you’ve never uploaded a YouTube video before, it only takes a few minutes and is very easy. And we’ve even arranged a short 30-minute training course to help you get started in your new role.

Click here to apply now.

There’s just one catch…

The deadline for this job application is 12:00am.

That’s midnight tonight!

So, please apply ASAP, as you’re perfect for this role.

Click here to apply now.

Best wishes,

Robert


















 
en philosophy of wiki – allowing anyone to edit content – does not ensure that every editor's intentions are well-mannered. For example, vandalism (changing wiki content to something offensive, adding nonsense, maliciously removing encyclopedic content, or deliberately adding incorrect information, such as hoax information) can be a major problem. On larger wiki sites, such as those run by the Wikimedia Foundation, vandalism can go unnoticed for some period of time. Wikis, because of their open nature, are susceptible to intentional disruption, known as "trolling". Wikis tend to take a soft-security approach to the problem of vandalism, making damage easy to undo rather than attempting to prevent damage. Larger wikis often employ sophisticated methods, such as bots that automatically identify and revert vandalism and JavaScript enhancements that show characters that have been added in each edit. In this way, vandalism can be limited to just "minor vandalism" or "sneaky vandalism", where the characters added/eliminated are so few that bots do not identify them and users do not pay much attention to them.[unreliable source] An example of a bot that reverts vandalism on Wikipedia is ClueBot NG. ClueBot NG can revert edits, often within minutes, if not seconds. The bot uses machine learning in lieu of heuristics. The amount of vandalism a wiki receives depends on how open the wiki is. For instance, some wikis allow unregistered users, identified by their IP addresses, to edit content, while others limit this function to just registered users. Edit wars can also occur as users repetitively revert a page to the version they favor. In some cases, editors with opposing views of which content should appear or what formatting style should be used will change and re-change each other's edits. This results in the page being "unstable" from a general user's perspective, because each time a general user comes to the page, it may look different. Some wiki software allows an administrator to stop such edit wars by locking a page from further editing until a decision has been made on what version of the page woul





 
--ecc971833d8ff3e217ff87f6eaed8201_16e30_60e51--